Reputation: 770
Given the following
case class A(value:Int)
case class B(value:String)
val h:Option[A] :: A :: Option[B] :: Option[A] :: HNil = Some(A(1)) :: A(2) :: Some(B("two")) :: (None:Option[B]) :: HNil
How can I get the following ?
A(1) :: A(2) :: B("two") :: HNil
My attempt below
trait a extends Poly1 {
implicit def any[T] = at[T](_ :: HNil)
}
object f extends a {
implicit def some[T] = at[Option[T]](t => if (t.isDefined) t.get :: HNil else HNil)
}
works for map
h map f
> A(1) :: HNil :: A(2) :: HNil :: B(two) :: HNil :: HNil :: HNil
but fail for flatMap
h flatMap f
> could not find implicit value for parameter mapper: shapeless.ops.hlist.FlatMapper[f.type,shapeless.::[Option[A],shapeless.::[A,shapeless.::[Option[B],shapeless.::[Option[B],shapeless.HNil]]]]]
Upvotes: 4
Views: 748
Reputation: 14224
Most likely the only thing you can do is define separate cases for Some
and for None
:
trait a extends Poly1 {
implicit def default[T] = at[T](_ :: HNil)
}
object f extends a {
implicit def caseSome[T] = at[Some[T]](_.get :: HNil)
implicit def caseNone = at[None.type](_ => HNil)
}
It also means you can't use generic Option
s in the types, it must be known at compile time whether each element is Some
or None
:
scala> (Some(A(1)) :: A(2) :: Some(B("two")) :: None :: HNil) flatMap f
res1: shapeless.::[A,shapeless.::[A,shapeless.::[B,shapeless.HNil]]] = A(1) :: A(2) :: B(two) :: HNil
This distinction defines the type of the resulting expression: Some(1) :: HNil flatMap f
will have type ::[Int, HNil]
, but None :: HNil flatMap f
will have type just HNil
.
This kind of type information can't be figured out at compile time from simple Option
s: should (x: Option[T]) :: HNil flatMap f
have type ::[T, HNil]
or HNil
? We don't know until we actually run the program and see what the value of x
is.
I'm not sure if there's some smart way to do it anyway and get an opaque HList
, but at that point you'll abandon exact type information about each element and the length of the list and may as well cast it to a normal List
(and maybe use cast
from shapeless later if you know what exact type the final result will have)
Upvotes: 1