Reputation: 1032
I am developing a ruby application which uses threads. I am having difficulty debugging it. The main problem is that I want to step through a particular thread. I set the breakpoint and run, but nothing happens until I use something like thr sw 2
. But then subsequent input is FUBAR'd. I have tried pry, but pry seems no better at dealing with threads.
Solutions? Work-arounds?
EDIT 1:
FYI: Pry version 0.10.1 on Ruby 2.0.0
with byebug
So here is what I experience with Pry. Try 1:I set the thread-specific breakpoint using break
Try 2: Using the "binding.pry" method above.
Pry output:
[2] pry(#<QDS::Node::Primary>)> step
From: /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p598/gems/pry-0.10.1/lib/pry/history.rb @ line 37 Pry::History#load:
35: def load
36: @loader.call do |line|
=> 37: @pusher.call(line.chomp)
38: @history << line.chomp
39: @original_lines += 1
40: end
41: end
[2] pry(#<Pry::History>)>
Pry output:
[1] pry(main)> continue
Error: Cannot find local context. Did you use `binding.pry`?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2388
Reputation: 121000
pry
is just fine working with threads. There are probably glitches in your code.
Let’s try to examine the following thread switcher (example was taken here):
require 'pry'
module SeqExec
class Seqs
attr_reader :init
def synch_prior mx, cv
Thread.new {
mx.synchronize {
@init[:prior] = true
loop do
cv.wait mx
# binding.pry
yield if block_given?
cv.broadcast
end
}
}
end
def synch_posterior mx, cv
Thread.new {
mx.synchronize {
@init[:posterior] = true
loop do
cv.wait mx
yield if block_given?
cv.broadcast
end
}
}
end
def synch λ1, λ2
@init = {}
mx = Mutex.new
cv = ConditionVariable.new
synch_prior(mx, cv, &λ1) # prior function
Thread.pass until {:prior=>true} == @init
synch_posterior(mx, cv, &λ2) # posterior function
Thread.pass until {:prior=>true,:posterior=>true} == @init
cv.signal # we are ready to start
end
end
end
module SeqExec
Thread.abort_on_exception = true
def pre &cb
@prior = cb
end
def post &cb
@posterior = cb
end
def run λ1 = nil, λ2 = nil
pre &λ1 if λ1
post &λ2 if λ2
raise ArgumentError.new "Cannot run sequential execution, lambdas are not set" \
unless (@prior && @posterior)
Seqs.new.synch @prior, @posterior
end
end
include SeqExec
@i=0
@stack = []
pre { sleep 0.3; print "-#{@i += 1}-"; @stack.push(@i) }
post { print "|#{@stack.pop}|" }
run
10.times { sleep 0.1 }
sleep 30000
With binding.pry
commented out, it prints:
#⇒ -1-|1|-2-|2|-3-|3|-4-|4|-5-|5|-6-|6|-7-........
With binding.pry
uncommented, we yield:
Frame number: 0/2
From: /tmp/a.rb @ line 12 SeqExec::Seqs#synch_prior:
6: def synch_prior mx, cv
7: Thread.new {
8: mx.synchronize {
9: @init[:prior] = true
10: loop do
11: cv.wait mx
=> 12: binding.pry
13: yield if block_given?
14: cv.broadcast
15: end
16: }
17: }
18: end
▶ mx
=> #<Mutex:0xb21f204>
▶ exit
-1-|1|
Frame number: 0/2
From: /tmp/a.rb @ line 12 SeqExec::Seqs#synch_prior:
6: def synch_prior mx, cv
7: Thread.new {
8: mx.synchronize {
9: @init[:prior] = true
10: loop do
11: cv.wait mx
=> 12: binding.pry
13: yield if block_given?
14: cv.broadcast
15: end
16: }
17: }
18: end
▶ exit
-2-|2|
Frame number: 0/2
...
Needless to say, the above means that threads stopped until pry
is resumed.
Upvotes: 1