CODEWITHSUNDEEP
pythonprintinglambdapython-2.x
Anycorn
Anycorn

Reputation: 51505

Why doesn't print work in a lambda?

Why doesn't this work?

lambda: print "x"

Is this not a single statement, or is it something else? The documentation seems a little sparse on what is allowed in a lambda...

Upvotes: 178

Views: 117364

Answers (10)

rkachach
rkachach

Reputation: 17355

If you want to print something inside a lambda func In Python 3.x you can do it as following:

my_func = lambda : print(my_message) or (any valid expression)

For example:

test = lambda x : print(x) or x**x

This works because print in Python 3.x is a function.

Upvotes: 3

Dmitry
Dmitry

Reputation: 81

in python3 print is a function, and you can print and return something as Jacques de Hooge suggests, but i like other approach: lambda x: print("Message") or x

print function returns nothing, so None or x code returns x other way around:
lambda x: x or print("Message") would print message only if x is false-ish

this is widely used in lua, and in python you can too instead of a if cond else b write cond and a or b

Upvotes: 2

Jacques de Hooge
Jacques de Hooge

Reputation: 7000

With Python 3.x, print CAN work in a lambda, without changing the semantics of the lambda.

Used in a special way this is very handy for debugging. I post this 'late answer', because it's a practical trick that I often use.

Suppose your 'uninstrumented' lambda is:

lambda: 4

Then your 'instrumented' lambda is:

lambda: (print (3), 4) [1]

Upvotes: 7

Danny Staple
Danny Staple

Reputation: 7332

In cases where I am using this for simple stubbing out I use this:

fn = lambda x: sys.stdout.write(str(x) + "\n")

which works perfectly.

Upvotes: 28

Victor Martins
Victor Martins

Reputation: 769

You can do something like this.

Create a function to transform print statement into a function:

def printf(text):
   print text

And print it:

lambda: printf("Testing")

Upvotes: 11

L̲̳o̲̳̳n̲̳̳g̲̳̳p̲̳o̲̳̳k̲̳̳e̲̳̳
L̲̳o̲̳̳n̲̳̳g̲̳̳p̲̳o̲̳̳k̲̳̳e̲̳̳

Reputation: 12570

A lambda's body has to be a single expression. In Python 2.x, print is a statement. However, in Python 3, print is a function (and a function application is an expression, so it will work in a lambda). You can (and should, for forward compatibility :) use the back-ported print function if you are using the latest Python 2.x:

In [1324]: from __future__ import print_function

In [1325]: f = lambda x: print(x)

In [1326]: f("HI")
HI

Upvotes: 202

vpit3833
vpit3833

Reputation: 7961

Here, you see an answer for your question. print is not expression in Python, it says.

Upvotes: 1

Paul Kuliniewicz
Paul Kuliniewicz

Reputation: 2731

The body of a lambda has to be an expression that returns a value. print, being a statement, doesn't return anything, not even None. Similarly, you can't assign the result of print to a variable:

>>> x = print "hello"
  File "<stdin>", line 1
    x = print "hello"
            ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

You also can't put a variable assignment in a lambda, since assignments are statements:

>>> lambda y: (x = y)
  File "<stdin>", line 1
    lambda y: (x = y)
                 ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

Upvotes: 11

tzaman
tzaman

Reputation: 47840

The body of a lambda has to be a single expression. print is a statement, so it's out, unfortunately.

Upvotes: 2

dagoof
dagoof

Reputation: 1139

what you've written is equivalent to

def anon():
    return print "x"

which also results in a SyntaxError, python doesn't let you assign a value to print in 2.xx; in python3 you could say

lambda: print('hi')

and it would work because they've changed print to be a function instead of a statement.

Upvotes: 25

Related Questions