CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javascriptajaxcometchatpolling
xRobot
xRobot

Reputation: 26573

Comet VS Ajax polling

I need to create a chat like facebook chat.

With Comet I need more memory to keep the connection.

With Ajax polling there is a latency problem if I send request every 3-4 seconds.

So... If the latency ( 3-4 seconds ) doesn't matter, Is Ajax Polling better for my case ?

Upvotes: 8

Views: 5936

Answers (3)

jmarranz
jmarranz

Reputation: 6469

@Vasil: "you can keep millions of opened connection"

Take a look to this problem

And regarding the false superiority of NIO over IO.

The iobound article just shows IO outperforms NIO and yes IO goes out of memory before NIO (by the way, the author has not tried to reduce the stack memory with a lower value).

Upvotes: 2

Vasil Remeniuk
Vasil Remeniuk

Reputation: 20619

Latency is not the only problem. COMET (long-polling) "saves" your traffic - when you use polling, you cannot know, if there were changes on the server, so some of the calls may be just a waste of traffic and resources (e.g., even if no one's chatting, you're making calls every 3-4 seconds). In case of COMET, you generally need one just call to get an update from the server (with 100% hit rate).

Upvotes: 6

Quotidian
Quotidian

Reputation: 2940

If latency isn't an issue then AJAX is probably better. Comet can encounter problems maintaining multiple connections between the same client/server pair if you're not very, very careful. (Ref)

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions