Reputation: 5190
I guess this question is geared more towards the language-geeks. I have the following class:
<?php
abstract class ScopeFactory
{
public static function doStuff()
{
}
}
Now, I'm able to call this function, like so:
ScopeFactory::doStuff()
And this works happily. I've always coded under the impression that abstract
classes could not be used directly - and they have to be implemented by a concrete class in order to be callable.
My impression of static
is that it does not require an instance to be callable.
Could someone explain to me why this is legal, and if it should be? I'm curious about the finer details.
Upvotes: 20
Views: 7827
Reputation: 1
abstract class ScopeFactory
{
public static function doStuff()
{
static::otherStuff();
}
abstract public static function otherStuff();
}
Class Factory Extends ScopeFactory{
static function otherStuff(){
echo "hello world";
}
}
Factory :: otherStuff();
in this there is no error occurred. Output is hello world
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1767
I would be surprised if this wouldn't be allowed. Abstract class assumes you cannot instantiate it. As static methods don't need a class instance, you can happily use them.
Looking deeper, you could create an abstract static method and call it from your non-abstract method:
abstract class ScopeFactory
{
public static function doStuff()
{
static::otherStuff();
}
abstract public static function otherStuff();
}
PHP will give you a fatal error saying you cannot call an abstract method. But also it'll give you a E_STRICT warning saying you shouldn't create abstract static methods.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 10253
Static methods in OOP do not change internal state, therefore you can call static methods from an abstract class.
Upvotes: 11