Reputation: 1047
I wrote simple consumer-producer program in C. It is working fine while I have 1 producer and 1 consumer. But it is acting strange when I increase number of consumers.
Second problem:
I have no idea why it is happening.
Code:
Producer:
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include "common.h"
int memoryID;
struct wrapper *memory;
int rc;
void atexit_function() {
rc = shmctl(memoryID, IPC_RMID, NULL);
rc = shmdt(memory);
sem_destroy(&memory->pmutex);
sem_destroy(&memory->cmutex);
sem_destroy(&memory->empty);
sem_destroy(&memory->full);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
atexit(atexit_function);
//creating key for shared memory
srand(time(NULL));
key_t sharedMemoryKey = ftok(".", MEMORY_KEY);
if (sharedMemoryKey == -1) {
perror("ftok():");
exit(1);
}
memoryID = shmget(sharedMemoryKey, sizeof(struct wrapper), IPC_CREAT | 0600);
if (memoryID == -1) {
perror("shmget():");
exit(1);
}
memory = shmat(memoryID, NULL, 0);
if (memory == (void *) -1) {
perror("shmat():");
exit(1);
}
//initialization
printf("Initializtaion !\n");
memset(&memory->array, 0, sizeof(memory->array));
sem_init(&memory->pmutex, 0, 1);
sem_init(&memory->cmutex, 0, 1);
sem_init(&memory->empty, 0, SIZE_OF_ARRAY);
sem_init(&memory->full, 0, 0);
memory->n = -1;
if (memoryID == -1) {
perror("shmget(): ");
exit(1);
}
while(1)
{
int r = rand();
sem_wait(&memory->empty);
sem_wait(&memory->pmutex);
memory->n++;
(memory->array)[memory->n]=r;
printf("Adding task\t Value:%d\tNumber of tasks waiting:%d \n",r,memory->n);
usleep(10000);
sem_post(&memory->pmutex);
sem_post(&memory->full);
}
}
Consumer:
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "common.h"
#include <sys/shm.h>
int memoryID;
struct wrapper *memory;
int check_prime(int a);
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
srand(time(NULL));
key_t sharedMemoryKey = ftok(".",MEMORY_KEY);
if(sharedMemoryKey==-1)
{
perror("ftok():");
exit(1);
}
memoryID=shmget(sharedMemoryKey,sizeof(struct wrapper),0);
if(memoryID==-1)
{
perror("shmget(): ");
exit(1);
}
memory = shmat(memoryID,NULL,0);
if(memory== (void*)-1)
{
perror("shmat():");
exit(1);
}
while(1)
{
sem_wait(&memory->full);
sem_wait(&memory->cmutex);
int n = memory->n;
int temp = (memory->array)[n];
printf("Removed item: %d\tPrime:%d\tNumer of tasks left:%d\n",
temp, check_prime(temp),n);
memory->n--;
usleep(10000);
sem_post(&memory->cmutex);
sem_post(&memory->empty);
}
}
common.h:
#define MEMORY_KEY 12
#define SIZE_OF_ARRAY 10
struct wrapper
{
int array[SIZE_OF_ARRAY];
sem_t empty;
sem_t pmutex;
sem_t cmutex;
sem_t full;
int n;
};
Upvotes: 1
Views: 3974
Reputation: 1047
Problem solved.
I was setting int sem_init(sem_t *sem, int pshared, unsigned int value);
I was setting pshared
value to 0 but:
The pshared argument indicates whether this semaphore is to be shared between the threads of a process, or between processes. If pshared has the value 0, then the semaphore is shared between the threads of a process, and should be located at some address that is visible to all threads (e.g., a global variable, or a variable allocated dynamically on the heap). If pshared is nonzero, then the semaphore is shared between processes, and should be located in a region of shared memory (see shm_open(3), mmap(2), and shmget(2)). (Since a child created by fork(2) inherits its parent's memory mappings, it can also access the semaphore.) Any process that can access the shared memory region can operate on the semaphore using sem_post(3), sem_wait(3), etc.
Upvotes: 1