CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#.netmultithreading
Eddie
Eddie

Reputation: 5080

.NET threading solution for long queries

Senerio

We have a C# .Net Web Application that records incidents. An external database needs to be queried when an incident is approved by a supervisor. The queries to this external database are sometimes taking a while to run. This lag is experienced through the browser.

Possible Solution

I want to use threading to eliminate the simulated hang to the browser. I have used the Thread class before and heard about ThreadPool. But, I just found BackgroundWorker in this post.

MSDN states:

The BackgroundWorker class allows you to run an operation on a separate, dedicated thread. Time-consuming operations like downloads and database transactions can cause your user interface (UI) to seem as though it has stopped responding while they are running. When you want a responsive UI and you are faced with long delays associated with such operations, the BackgroundWorker class provides a convenient solution.

Is BackgroundWorker the way to go when handling long running queries?

What happens when 2 or more BackgroundWorker processes are ran simultaneously? Is it handled like a pool?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 2149

Answers (4)

Reed Copsey
Reed Copsey

Reputation: 564751

If you're using .NET 4 (or can use the TPL backport from the Rx Framework), then one nice option is to use a Task created with the LongRunning hint.

This provides many options difficult to accomplish via the ThreadPool or BackgroundWorker, including allowing for continuations to be specified at creation time, as well as allowing for clean cancellation and exception/error handling.

Upvotes: 1

Sonic Soul
Sonic Soul

Reputation: 24939

BackgroundWrokerks are just like any other threads, accept they can be killed or quit, w/out exiting the main thread and your application.

ThreadPool uses a pool of BackgroundWorkers. It is the preferred way of most multi threading scenarios because .net manages threads for you, and it re-uses them instead of creating new ones as needed which is a expensive process.

Such threading scenarios are great for processor intensive code.

For something like a query which happens externally, you also have the option of asynchronous data access. You can hand off the query request, and give it the name of your callback method, which will be called when query is finished and than do something with the result (i.e. update UI status or display returned data)..

.Net has inbuilt support for asynchronous data querying http://www.devx.com/dotnet/Article/26747

Upvotes: 0

Mike Marshall
Mike Marshall

Reputation: 7850

Yes, BackgroundWorker can significantly simplify your threading code for long-running operations. The key is registering for the DoWork, ProgressChanged, and RunWorkerCompleted events. These help you avoid having to have a bunch of synchronization objects passed back and forth with the thread to try to determine the progress of the operation.

Also, I believe the progress events are called on the UI thread, avoiding the need for calls to Control.Invoke to update your UI.

To answer your last question, yes, threads are allocated from the .NET thread pool, so you while you may instantiate as many BackgroundWorker objects as you'd like, you can only run as many concurrent operations as the thread pool will allow.

Upvotes: 2

AlwaysAProgrammer
AlwaysAProgrammer

Reputation: 2919

I had ran in similar situation with long running queries. I used the asynchronous invoke provided by delegates. You can use the BeginInvoke method of the delegate.

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions