Reputation: 2694
I have a use-case of inserting a lot of data during big calculation which really don't have to be available in the cluster immediately (so the cluster can synchronize as we go).
Currently I'm inserting batches using putAll() operation and it's blocking and taking time. I've read a blog post about efficiency of set() operation but there is no analogous setAll(). I also saw putAsync() and didn't see matching putAllAsync() (I'm not interested in the future object).
Am I overlooking something? How can I improve insertion performance?
EDIT: Feature request: https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast/issues/5337
Upvotes: 2
Views: 876
Reputation: 6094
I think you're right, they're missing. Could you create a feature request, maybe you're also interested in helping to implement them using the Hazelcast Incubator?
Upvotes: 2