CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javamultithreadingstatic-methods
user353682
user353682

Reputation: 321

Static method,new thread performance question

i just have two questions about two methods used in many controllers/servlets in my app:

1-what is the difference between calling a static method in a util class or a non static method (like methods dealing with dates i.e getting current time,converting between timezones), which is better ? 2-what is the difference between calling a method(contain too many logic like sending emails) in the controller directly or running this method in a different thread ?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 1121

Answers (4)

Shikhar Mishra
Shikhar Mishra

Reputation: 2075

1)

  • Utils classes generally don't have any state associated with them. They just have behavior. Hence there really isn't much point in creating "instances" of them.
  • Even though compiler won't ever complain, instantiating a Util class would be a misleading coding.
  • Being Stateless Utils classes are completely thread safe. Class methods, whether static or not, get copied to every threads stack frame and cause no interference to each other. Java Utils classes are excellent examples of this.

2)

  • If your method is time consuming one, it makes sense to make it's call asynchronous.

Upvotes: 3

Gray
Gray

Reputation: 116918

#1 Seems to have been answered well in other responses.

#2 Depends on the circumstance. If the controller is having to wait for the other thread to finish with the sending email task before it can continue then there is no speed improvement at all -- in fact there would be speed loss due to the context switch and synchronization. If the controller can service another request or if it can do something else in parallel with the email sending thread then there would be a gain.

Typically, if a controller needs to send email, it gives the job off to a worker thread and then continues on its way in parallel and handles the next request. This is faster but it means that there is no way to report back problems to the caller if the email sending failed.

Upvotes: 0

Kiril
Kiril

Reputation: 40395

1: So the static keyword only tells you about the accessibility of the method. If the method is static it can be accessed without instantiating an object. So it doesn't make sense to ask which is better: static or non-static.

2: Calling a method that has some time-consuming logic on a separate thread allows your main thread to continue working on some other things which are important. So if you have two time-consuming tasks that you need to execute for a client, then running those two tasks on separate thread can get the job done faster.

Note that all of this is said with the assumption that the programmer knows how to do proper threading... if the threading is not done correctly, then there could be a slew of problems: deadlocks, invalid object states, decreased performance, etc.

Upvotes: 0

Powerlord
Powerlord

Reputation: 88826

There are advantages and disadvantages to using static methods:

Advantages:

  1. You don't have to instantiate an object to use them.
  2. Static variables defined in the class stay the same between calls.

Disadvantages:

  1. You can only access static variables and static methods without creating an instance of an object to call them on.
  2. Not inherently thread-safe... You must synchronize either the method or a section of code if you don't want other threads changing variables on you.

In my personal experience, static methods are great for things that don't require you to maintain state between calls. Like formatting dates.

Having said that, time operations are pretty easy. Getting the current time is as easy as:

Date currentDate = new Date();

or

Calendar currentCal = Calendar.getInstance();

Calendar can also be used to roll Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY (and Calendar.MINUTE if necessary) if you know the difference between the time zones.

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions