CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#.netsilverlightdata-bindingxaml
Ben McCormack
Ben McCormack

Reputation: 33078

How do I set the ItemsSource of a DataGrid in XAML?

I'm trying to set the ItemsSource property of a DataGrid named dgIssueSummary to be an ObservableCollection named IssueSummaryList. Currently, everything is working when I set the ItemsSource property in my code-behind:

public partial class MainPage : UserControl
{
    private ObservableCollection<IssueSummary> IssueSummaryList = new ObservableCollection<IssueSummary>

    public MainPage()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
        dgIssueSummary.ItemsSource = IssueSummaryList
    }
}

However, I'd rather set the ItemsSource property in XAML, but I can't get it to work. Here's the XAML code I have:

<sdk:DataGrid x:Name="dgIssueSummary" AutoGenerateColumns="False"
                ItemsSource="{Binding IssueSummaryList}" >
    <sdk:DataGrid.Columns>
        <sdk:DataGridTextColumn Binding="{Binding ProblemType}" Header="Problem Type"/>
        <sdk:DataGridTextColumn Binding="{Binding Count}" Header="Count"/>
    </sdk:DataGrid.Columns>
</sdk:DataGrid>

What do I need to do to set the ItemsSource property to be the IssueSummaryList in XAML rather than C#?

Upvotes: 3

Views: 13702

Answers (3)

Dabblernl
Dabblernl

Reputation: 16101

The XAML is correct, so the problem must be in the Binding.

  • Is the ObservableCollection exposed as a property?

  • How have you set the Binding? In the most simple case you use code like:

    this.DataContext=this;

in the Window_Load eventhandler

Upvotes: 1

Mohnkuchenzentrale
Mohnkuchenzentrale

Reputation: 5885

Your IssueSummaryList is private. You need to make it a Property with get and set

public ObservableCollection<IssueSummary> IssueSummaryList 
{
     get
     {
        // ...
     }
}

Upvotes: 1

Reed Copsey
Reed Copsey

Reputation: 564363

You need to make "IssueSummaryList" a property. If you do this, you can bind to it directly. You can't bind via Xaml to a private field.

You'll also need to set the DataContext to "this" (or use another method to get it to find the appropriate instance).

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions