Reputation: 854
So i know that InputStream
sees the data as raw data and Reader
sees it as characters.
Buffered them will make things more efficient.
But how about chaining them like this:
InputStream in = new InputStream(...);
in = new BufferedInputStream(in);
Reader r = new InputStreamReader(in);
r = new BufferedReader(r);
Is this right?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 1535
Reputation: 854
This kind of question already answered : https://stackoverflow.com/a/15799469/3480200
With some opinion from others i conclude that:
It's not ok to use buffered inside another buffered in my case. It's useless.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation:
In Java 7, Here is an example of application that simply read a file 4MB using BufferedReader
and InputStreamReader
combined to BufferedInputStream
and compare the performance of reading of bout techniques under Java 7.
import java.io.BufferedInputStream;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.FileReader;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
public class MainIO_Optimization {
public static void main(String[] args) {
BufferedInputStream bis = null;
InputStreamReader isr = null;
BufferedReader br = null;
try {
// ------ 1 ------
bis = new BufferedInputStream(new FileInputStream(new File("data/dictionnaire.txt")));
isr = new InputStreamReader(bis);
// ------ 2 ---------------
br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("data/dictionnaire.txt"));
char[] buf = new char[10];
// ****** Performance *****
// we get system time
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
// we simply read
while( br.read(buf) != -1 );
// print the time of execution
System.out.println("Time reading using BufferedReader with FileReader : "+ (System.currentTimeMillis()-startTime) + " ms" );
long startTime2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
while( isr.read(buf) != -1 );
System.out.println("Time reading using InputStreamReader with BufferedInputStream et FileInputStream : " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime2 + " ms" ));
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally{
try {
if(bis != null)
bis.close();
if(isr != null)
isr.close();
if(br != null)
br.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
Time reading using BufferedReader with FileReader : 31 ms
Time reading using InputStreamReader with BufferedInputStream et FileInputStream : 32 ms
As you can see the result is 1 ms difference. BufferedReader
is faster.
In Java 8 , you better use NIO
package rather than IO
. So FileChannels
will be more efficient.
Upvotes: 1