Reputation: 3200
I am looking into using a lightweight serverless database engine like SQLite, Firebird, or VistaDB in an upcoming project.
Someone asked about What are the advantages of VistaDB.
I would like to know what are the disadvantages of using VistaDB versus other technology?
UPDATE (07/13/2010): VistaDB out of business (the real disadvantage)
I have just learned that Infinite Codex (the company that owns and makes VistaDB) is going out of business and the offices will close as of August 1, 2010. View the company press release regarding the closing.
UPDATE (02/11/2011): VistaDB product back in business!
Before Infinite Codex closed its doors, it sold the VistaDB product to eSymmetrix, Inc. The VistaDB software is now alive and well....for the time being.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 3603
Reputation: 74909
UPDATE: VistaDB out of business
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 682
Support for Shared Network Drives
Firebird server – and any databases you create or connect to – must reside on a hard drive that is physically connected to the host machine. You cannot locate components of the server, or any database, on a mapped drive, a filesystem share or a network filesystem.
Network multi user access from shared drives
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1183
You can always Choose firebird it's free forever and is better than Full SQL Server and SQL Server Compact Edition 4 and is better than VistaDB and sqlite.
http://blog.cincura.net/231742-firebird-embedded-in-comparison-to-sql-server-compact-edition-4/
And it will be supported forever, it does have a fundation type organization that will grow forever. Think that is similar like apache or debian (voluntary and is not for profit).
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 5256
You might want to check out MS SQL CE 4.0, it's a serverless version of MS SQL.
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/06/30/new-embedded-database-support-with-asp-net.aspx
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1386
I have not used SQLite, so I will reply for Firebird and VistaDB.
Upvotes: 1