Reputation: 78758
Is it possible to forward declare an standard container in a header file? For example, take the following code:
#include <vector>
class Foo
{
private:
std::vector<int> container_;
...
};
I want to be able to do something like this:
namespace std
{
template <typename T> class vector;
}
class Foo
{
private:
std::vector<int> container_;
...
};
Can this be done?
Upvotes: 53
Views: 28265
Reputation: 39109
Apart from what the others said, you may find it useful to know that there is a sanctioned way of forward-declaring iostreams and some related templates: The header <iosfwd>
. It would be useful if the standard had more such headers.
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 90543
I don't think so because the compiler would have no way of knowing how much space to allocate for the container_
object. At best you could do:
std::vector<int> *container_;
and new it in the constructor, since the compiler knows the size of a pointer.
Upvotes: 18
Reputation: 163357
Declaring vector
in the std
namespace is undefined behavior. So, your code might work, but it also might not, and the compiler is under no obligation to tell you when your attempt won't work. That's a gamble, and I don't know that avoiding the inclusion of a standard C++ header is worth that.
See the following comp.std.c++.moderated discussion:
forward declaring std::vector. Works, but is it legal and standard compliant?
Upvotes: 39