Reputation: 8902
It says here that the common classloader is visible to all web application. So what is the difference between having a JAR file within the WEB-INF/lib
folder of my war
application and having the same JAR file within Tomcat's lib
folder?
This JAR is a provider for a Java SPI that I created. When I have it under WEB-INF/lib
, everything works perfectly. But if I try to put this JAR under Tomcat's lib
folder (or under shared/lib
after configuring it in catalina.properties
) I get errors. The second option is better for me because I need total decoupling of my application and the provider.
The error I get is a ClassNotFoundException
for the interface that represents my service (which the JAR implements). This interface is in a third project, which is a dependency for my war
application.
Upvotes: 4
Views: 5026
Reputation: 41
The difference is the classloader being used. Tomcat has very specific rules for it's classloaders, some of them are counter intuitive. Your problem here, is that a class loaded in one classloader is not compatible with a class loaded in another. Even Object to Object will fail.
The jar containing your interface is loaded by the webapp classloader since it is located in the war-file. The implementation is loaded by the common classloader. This does not contain your interface, so it throws a ClassNotFoundException.
The solution is to move all jars into the same classloader. Either everything in the lib-folder, or everything in your war.
Implementing a plug-in architecture with Tomcat is a rather difficult undertaking. Using something like OSGi would probably help. But for small problems, it's probably overkill. Fun, but overkill.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 9677
The tomcat/lib
directory should be used for shared libraries for the whole web server and WEB-INF/lib
only for one web application.
Upvotes: 5