Reputation: 17173
I understand that forking is cloning the repository on the server side. But I don't understand why I would do that.
Why not clone the original repository to my machine, add my code, than push the new branch to GitHub and make a pull request?
Upvotes: 72
Views: 36421
Reputation: 83
Another perspective - why fork within a company where you even might have push permission.
I prefer the forking workflow also withing my company. This keeps the upstream repo in a clean condition. It has only official branches and tags and it's not cluttered by 100+ or 1000+ of dev branches etc.. When you fetch the upstream you can clearly see what happened where as without forking, when fetching you get so many changes that it's too cluttered. There are teams that treat their repos as if they were external open source repos - i.e. they don't allow pushing anything to their repos - only pull requests from forks are allowed.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 66183
I understand that forking is cloning the repository on the server side [...]
That's about right. On GitHub, a fork is a copy of some other GitHub repo, with a reference to the repo it was copied from.
Remark: the concept of a fork originated with GitHub; it is not a Git concept.
[...] but I don't understand why I would do that. Why not clone the original repository to my machine, add my code, then push the new branch to GitHub and make a pull request?
Unless you have write access to the repository in question, you cannot simply push anything to it; your push will be denied by the server with an error message of the form
remote: Permission to bos/text.git denied to Jubobs.
fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/bos/text/': The requested URL returned error: 403
That's where a fork comes into play. By forking someone else's repo, you get a copy to which you have write access, i.e. to which you can push your contributions. The entire workflow goes something like this:
Upvotes: 101
Reputation: 6588
Forking makes it clear that your repository derives from the other, by marking your repository as "forked from..." and more importantly, it will list your repository in the fork list of the original project.
One of the advantages of that is that in the event that the original project becomes discontinued while you are still working on it, people can still find your repository looking on the fork list from the main repository.
From github's point of view, they can save some disk space by knowing that the git objects between your and the original repository are the same and can be shared
Moreover, I think you cannot make a pull request from a repository which is not a fork of the original one. At least I wasn't able to do it, I had to fork, push to the fork, ask for a pull request.
Upvotes: 8
Reputation: 4061
From the Github documentation
A fork is a copy of a repository. Forking a repository allows you to freely experiment with changes without affecting the original project.
Most commonly, forks are used to either propose changes to someone else's project or to use someone else's project as a starting point for your own idea.
https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/
Upvotes: 45