Reputation: 5808
I've a for loop in javascript shown below. How to convert it to lodash for loop? In such scenarios using lodash is advantageous over javascript for loop?
I've not used lodash much. Hence please advice.
for (var start = b, i = 0; start < end; ++i, ++start) {
// code goes here
}
Upvotes: 11
Views: 27473
Reputation: 3651
You can use lodash range
https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.4#range
_.range(5, 10).forEach((current, index, range) => {
console.log(current, index, range)
})
// 5, 0, [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
// 6, 1, [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
// 7, 2, [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
// 8, 3, [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
// 9, 4, [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
// 10, 5, [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 3707
I will imagine that b = 3
and end = 10
if I run your code and print the variables here is what I will get:
var b = 3;
var end = 10;
for (var start = b, i = 0; start < end; ++i, ++start) {
console.log(start, i);
}
> 3 0
> 4 1
> 5 2
> 6 3
> 7 4
> 8 5
> 9 6
To perform this with lodash (or underscore) I will first generate an array with range
then iterate over it and gets the index on each iteration.
Here is the result
var b = 3;
var end = 10;
// this will generate an array [ 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]
var array = _.range(b, end);
// now I iterate over it
_.each(array, function (value, key) {
console.log(value, key);
});
And you will get the same result. The complexity is the same as the previous one (so no performance issue).
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 3048
It seems there is no lodash way for writing loose for
loops (those not iterating over a collection), but here is a simplified version of it:
for (var i = 0; i < end - b; i++) {
var start = i + b;
// code goes here
}
Upvotes: 0