CODEWITHSUNDEEP
.netxamlconfigurationxml-serialization
flq
flq

Reputation: 22859

Would it make sense to use XAML for configuration scenarios?

One simple way to add some configuration is to define a configuration section which is not much more than some object that can be (de)serialized based on the XmlSerializer classes.

Now, XAML is at its heart more or less a hierarchy of objects but provides things like naming of elements, binding, etc.

Has anyone ever used XAML outside its intended scope of declaratively defining WPF / Silverlight UIs, e.g. to set up a class that contains configuration settings? What would be the merits of doing so or why is it a bad idea?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 70

Answers (1)

Rowland Shaw
Rowland Shaw

Reputation: 38130

I'd say it doesn't make much sense, when you could just use an app.config file (which is XML, and can support custom sections) - the framework has much better support, as this is its defined purpose.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions