Reputation: 455
I'm using class enum.Enum in order to create a variable with selected members.
The main reason is to enable other developers in my team to use the same convention by selecting one of several permitted members for variable.
I would like to create a Boolean variable in the same way, enabling other developers to select either True or False.
Is it possible to define an enum which will receive True False options? Is there any better alternative?
The following options don't work:
boolean_enum = Enum('boolean_enum', 'True False')
boolean_enum = Enum('boolean_enum', True False)
Upvotes: 10
Views: 9889
Reputation: 3638
Often I've started with a boolean variable (can_access = True|False
) but then later needed to replace it with something more nuanced (can_access = True|False|'only_superuser'|'unless_leapday'
)
In your own code, it's easy to change this, but when you've released a public library people will have already written code expecting a boolean here. The problem of course is that in a boolean context, both 'only_superuser' and 'unless_leapday' will evaluate to True, but presumably 'only_superuser' should be False for naïve/existing implementations (and probably unless_leapday
should be True).
So I wrote BooleanEnum
which allows for a drop-in replacement for previous Boolean variables. If a value is a tuple, it is expected to be
(BooleanValue, NormalLabel):
class CanAccess(BooleanEnum):
TRUE = True
FALSE = False
ONLY_SUPERUSER = (False, 'only_superuser')
UNLESS_LEAPDAY = (True, 'unless_leapday')
It becomes a drop-in replacement for if can_access:
type of checks. Unfortunately, there's no way to do a drop-in for if can_access is True:
types of checks.
The code is part of the music21 library under music21.common.enums.BooleanEnum, but you don't want that whole library as a dependency just for it, so here's the code (minus comments):
class BooleanEnum(Enum):
@staticmethod
def is_bool_tuple(v):
if isinstance(v, tuple) and len(v) == 2 and isinstance(v[0], bool):
return True
else:
return False
def __eq__(self, other):
if isinstance(other, self.__class__):
return super().__eq__(other)
v = self.value
if v == other:
return True
elif self.is_bool_tuple(v):
if v[0] is other:
return True
return v[1] == other
return False
def __bool__(self):
v = self.value
if self.is_bool_tuple(v):
return v[0]
return bool(self.value)
def __repr__(self):
return f'<{self.__class__.__name__}.{self.name}>'
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 837
Nowadays (python 3.6+) this could be much more conveniently achieved by using enum.Flag
:
from enum import Flag
class Boolean(Flag):
TRUE = True
FALSE = False
An added benefit of enum.Flag
over enum.Enum
is that it supports (and is closed under) bit-wise operators (&,|,~
) from the get-go:
>>> Boolean.TRUE & Boolean.FALSE
Boolean.FALSE
>>> Boolean.TRUE | Boolean.FALSE
Boolean.TRUE
>>> ~Boolean.FALSE
Boolean.TRUE
For more information see https://docs.python.org/3/library/enum.html#enum.Flag
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 2424
boolean_enum = Enum('boolean_enum', [('True', True), ('False', False)])
Checkout the documentation of this API: https://docs.python.org/3/library/enum.html#functional-api
If you just specify 'True False' for the names parameter, they will be assigned automatic enumerated values (1,2) which is not what you want. And of courase you can't just send True False without it being a string argument for the names parameter.
so what you want is one of the options that allow you to specify name and value, such as the above.
Edit:
When defined as above, the enum elements aren't accessible by boolean_enum.True
(but they are accessible by boolean_enum['True']
or boolean_enum(True)
).
To avoid this issue, the field names can be changed and defined as
Enum('boolean_enum', [('TRUE', True), ('FALSE', False)])
Then accessed as boolean_enum.TRUE
or boolean_enum['TRUE']
or boolean_enum(True)
Upvotes: 6