CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#stringmemory
Edeen
Edeen

Reputation: 249

String VS Byte[], memory usage

I have an application that uses a large amount of strings. So I have some problem of memory usage. I know that one of the best solution in this case is to use a DB, but I cannot use this for the moment, so I am looking for others solutions.

In C# string are store in Utf16, that means I lost half of the memory usage compare to Utf8 (for the major part of my strings). So I decided to use byte array of utf8 string. But to my surprise this solution took twice more memory space than simple strings in my application.

So I have done some simple test, but I want to know the opinion of experts to be sure.

Test 1 : Fixed length strings allocation

var stringArray = new string[10000];
var byteArray = new byte[10000][];
var Sb = new StringBuilder();
var utf8 = Encoding.UTF8;
var stringGen = new Random(561651);
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
    for (int j = 0; j < 10000; j++) {
        Sb.Append((stringGen.Next(90)+32).ToString());
    }
    stringArray[i] = Sb.ToString();
    byteArray[i] = utf8.GetBytes(Sb.ToString());
    Sb.Clear();
}
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForFullGCComplete(5000);

Memory Usage

00007ffac200a510        1        80032 System.Byte[][]
00007ffac1fd02b8       56       152400 System.Object[]
000000bf7655fcf0      303      3933750      Free
00007ffac1fd5738    10004    224695091 System.Byte[]
00007ffac1fcfc40    10476    449178396 System.String

As we can see, bytes arrays take twice less memory space, no real surprise here.

Test 2 : Random size string allocation (with a realistic length)

var stringArray = new string[10000];
var byteArray = new byte[10000][];
var Sb = new StringBuilder();
var utf8 = Encoding.UTF8;
var lengthGen = new Random(2138784);
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
    for (int j = 0; j < lengthGen.Next(100); j++) {
        Sb.Append(i.ToString());
        stringArray[i] = Sb.ToString();
        byteArray[i] = utf8.GetBytes(Sb.ToString());
    }
    Sb.Clear();
}
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForFullGCComplete(5000);

Memory Usage

00007ffac200a510        1        80032 System.Byte[][]
000000be2aa8fd40       12        82784      Free
00007ffac1fd02b8       56       152400 System.Object[]
00007ffac1fd5738     9896       682260 System.Byte[]
00007ffac1fcfc40    10368      1155110 System.String

String takes a little less space than twice time the memory space of byte array. With shorter string I was expecting a greater overhead for strings. But it seems that the opposite is, why?

Test 3 : String model corresponding to my application

var stringArray = new string[10000];
var byteArray = new byte[10000][];
var Sb = new StringBuilder();
var utf8 = Encoding.UTF8;
var lengthGen = new Random();
for (int i=0; i < 10000; i++) {
    if (i%2 == 0) {
        for (int j = 0; j < lengthGen.Next(100000); j++) {
            Sb.Append(i.ToString());
            stringArray[i] = Sb.ToString();
            byteArray[i] = utf8.GetBytes(Sb.ToString());
            Sb.Clear();
        }
    } else {
        stringArray[i] = Sb.ToString();
        byteArray[i] = utf8.GetBytes(Sb.ToString());
        Sb.Clear();
    }
}
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForFullGCComplete(5000);

Memory Usage

00007ffac200a510        1        80032 System.Byte[][]
00007ffac1fd02b8       56       152400 System.Object[]
00007ffac1fcfc40     5476       198364 System.String
00007ffac1fd5738    10004       270075 System.Byte[]

Here strings take much less memory space than byte. This can be surprising, but I supposed that empty string are referenced only once. Is it? But I don't know if this can explain all that huge difference. Is it any other reason? What is the best solution?

Upvotes: 12

Views: 3668

Answers (1)

Sergey Kalinichenko
Sergey Kalinichenko

Reputation: 726519

This can be surprising, but I supposed that empty string are referenced only once.

Yes, an empty StringBuilder returns string.Empty as its result. The code snippet below prints True:

var sb = new StringBuilder();
Console.WriteLine(object.ReferenceEquals(sb.ToString(), string.Empty));

But I don't know if this can explain all that huge difference.

Yes, this perfectly explains it. You are saving on 5,000 string objects. The difference in bytes is roughly 270,000-(198,000/2), so about 170 kBytes. Dividing by 5 you get 34 bytes per object, which is roughly the size of a pointer on a 32-bit system.

What is the best solution?

Do the same thing: make yourself a private static readonly empty array, and use it each time that you get string.Empty from sb.ToString():

private static readonly EmptyBytes = new byte[0];
...
else
{
    stringArray[i] = Sb.ToString();
    if (stringArray[i] == string.Empty) {
        byteArray[i] = EmptyBytes;
    } else {
        byteArray[i] = utf8.GetBytes(Sb.ToString());
    }
    Sb.Clear();
}

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions