Reputation: 2865
Looking in ZuulConfiguration, I see the following:
@Bean
public ZuulController zuulController() {
return new ZuulController();
}
@Bean
public ServletRegistrationBean zuulServlet() {
return new ServletRegistrationBean(new ZuulServlet(),
this.zuulProperties.getServletPattern());
}
ZuulController wraps the ZuulServlet and manages its lifecycle as if it were a Spring Controller. What throws me is that the ZuulConfiguration class registers the servlet anyways using a ServletRegistrationBean. Perhaps I am thinking the wrong thing, but I would think that you would do one or the other. Could someone explain why both are necessary?
Using this configuration, is the ZuulServlet running as a true servlet (known by the embedded servlet container), a controller (which delegates to the servlet) or both?
Thanks,
Joshua
Upvotes: 1
Views: 2106
Reputation: 25147
From this commit:
Allow streaming of multipart requests in Zuul proxy
It turns out that the suckiness of Zuul with multipart requests comes almost entirely from the Multipart handling in Spring's DispatcherServlet. This change makes the proxy routes available on an alternative path /zuul/ (where /zuul is the default value of zuul.servletPath). I have tested those with 800MB file uploads using the main method in the FormZuulServletProxyApplicationTests and the main observation is that there is no OutOfMemory error (no-one tries to download the complete request body). It works with Ribbon and with the simple (HttpClient) filter. With Ribbon you will need to set some timeouts if you want to upload files as large as that, e.g. see application.yml in the tests:
hystrix.command.default.execution.isolation.thread.timeoutInMilliseconds: 60000
ribbon:
ConnectTimeout: 3000
ReadTimeout: 60000
You need to set "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" in the incoming request. Chrome does not do this by default apparently, but I was able to test with curl, e.g.
$ curl -v -H "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" \
-F "[email protected]" \
localhost:9999/zuul/direct/file
The old proxy paths through the DispatcherServlet are still available (for backwards compatibility and for convenience of having the paths available at the root of the context path).
Upvotes: 2