Reputation: 60711
here is my expression:
=([Panels] not Like '*IT_AMPH,*' and [Panels] not Like '*AMPH_SN,*' and [Panels] not Like '*AMPH_S,*')
can i say this instead:
= not ([Panels] Like '*IT_AMPH,*' Or [Panels] Like '*AMPH_SN,*' Or [Panels] Like '*AMPH_S,*')
are these expressions the same?
*****i need to mention that my question is not about logic it is about whether access will take this syntax*****
Upvotes: 1
Views: 98
Reputation: 453047
Yep. This is just de Morgan's law. I had to think a bit about the effect of NULLS but in both versions if [Panels] IS NULL then the end result will be unknown.
In answer to your clarified question. Yes as well. I added a new "Yes/No" column to the Northwind Customers table called "TF" and both the following statements had the same effect.
UPDATE Customers SET
TF = not ([Last Name] Like '*A*' Or
[Last Name] Like '*B*' Or
[Last Name] Like '*C*');
UPDATE Customers SET
TF = ([Last Name] not Like '*A*' and
[Last Name] not Like '*B*' and
[Last Name] not Like '*C*');
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 24988
(NOT A) AND (NOT B) is the same as NOT (A OR B), and this extends to more than two terms. However - sometimes NULL handling can trip you up on this. If you've no NULLs in [Panels] then all will be well, otherwise, test. :)
Upvotes: 3