CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javac++variable-assignmentassignment-operator
Jurko Guba
Jurko Guba

Reputation: 638

Java assignment operator behavior vs C++

This occured while I was tackling a 'Cracking the Coding interview' question:

Write a function to swap a number in place (that is, without temporary variables)

I decided to write up my solution in Java (because I plan on using Java in my internship interviews.)

I came up with a solution that I was almost confident was the right answer (because I did it in one line):

    public static void main(String args[]) {
        int a = 5;
        int b = 7;
        a = b - a + (b = a);
        System.out.println("a: " + a + " b: " + b);
    }

Surely enough, this code executes the desired result. a == 7 and b == 5.

Now here's the funny part.

This code won't run in C++ nor is this solution in the back of the book.

So my question is: Why exactly does my solution work? I am assuming Java does things differently than other languages?

Upvotes: 5

Views: 776

Answers (1)

Erwin Bolwidt
Erwin Bolwidt

Reputation: 31299

Looks at the Java Language Specification, section 15.7 (Evaluation Order):

The Java programming language guarantees that the operands of operators appear to be evaluated in a specific evaluation order, namely, from left to right.

So in Java the evaluation order is well-defined and does what you expect.

The C++ specification doesn't provide such a guarantee; in fact it's Undefined Behavior so the program could literally do anything.

Quoting from the cppreference, noting that no sequencing rule exists for sequencing operands to arithmetic operators:

If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to a value computation using the value of the same scalar object, the behavior is undefined.

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions