CODEWITHSUNDEEP
gitversion-controlbranchrebase
Brendan
Brendan

Reputation: 2391

Automatically rebase Git sub-branches

Say I have a git history like this:

A--B--C--D <master>
   \--E--F <topic1>
         \--G <topic2>

That is, I have two topic branches, where one feature depends upon another. In the meantime, work has been done on master, so I want to rebase topic1. This results in:

A--B--C--D <master>
   |     \--E'--F' <topic1>
   \--E--F--G <topic2>

That is, topic1 was rebased but topic2 was not. I want to get to this:

A--B--C--D <master>
         \--E'--F' <topic1>
                \--G <topic2>

But if I simply do git rebase topic1 topic2, Git will try to replay commits E and F on top of E' and F', which will fail because they edit the same lines of the same files. So I have to run something unwieldy like this:

git rebase --onto topic1 <sha1-of-commit-F> topic2

... which requires doing a git log and copy-pasting something (using the mouse like some sort of loser!). I know this isn't exactly heartbreaking, but this usage pattern must be fairly common for Git. Can anyone think of a way to rebase topic1 and topic2 in one fell swoop?

Upvotes: 1

Views: 4961

Answers (2)

Brendan
Brendan

Reputation: 2391

Git 2.38 now has the --update-refs arg for rebase.

Upvotes: 3

Brendan
Brendan

Reputation: 2391

As Nils_M pointed out in a comment, the rebase man page says Note that any commits in HEAD which introduce the same textual changes as a commit in HEAD..<upstream> are omitted (i.e., a patch already accepted upstream with a different commit message or timestamp will be skipped).

The only reason Git would replay E and F during the rebase of topic2 onto topic1 is if E' or F' has been modified from their originals. In that case, when the rebase stops due the merge conflict, simply use git rebase --skip.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions