Reputation: 6591
I currently have a cluster of 4 Apache web servers which are used to serve up static files of up to 30Mb in size. Generally, I can expect up to 5000 concurrent connections to these servers. What performance improvement would I expect to get by moving this to lighttpd?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 322
Reputation:
From the top of my head:
Definitely check out the benchmark at their site, they provide a lot of information on this topic: http://www.lighttpd.net/benchmark
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 5759
If you are using Apache with MPM with worker or event you probably won't see much of a difference. If you haven't moved to using them I would give that a try. There isn't really any problem with lighttpd though either. I think today it is just a matter of picking one and going with it.
If I where serving that type of file I would push it out to a CDN and not have to worry about it. There are plenty of cheap ones now like CacheFly and Amazon's Cloudfront.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 91040
I would expect it to handle the concurrency with much more ease and less memory overhead. I've stopped deploying Apache pretty much everywhere I can.
You may also consider nginx for a comparison.
Upvotes: 1