CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javastring
Mr Morgan
Mr Morgan

Reputation: 543

Using String or StringBuffer in Java: which is better?

I read a lot about using StringBuffer and String especially where concatenation is concerned in Java and whether one is thread safe or not.

So, in various Java methods, which should be used?

For example, in a PreparedStatement, should query be a StringBuffer:

    String query = ("SELECT * " +
                    "FROM User " +
                    "WHERE userName = ?;");

    try {
        ps = connection.prepareStatement(query);

And then again, in a String utility methods like:

public static String prefixApostrophesWithBackslash(String stringIn) {
    String stringOut = stringIn.replaceAll("'", "\\\\'");
    return stringOut;
}

And:

 // Removes a char from a String.
public static String removeChar(String stringIn, char c) {
    String stringOut = ("");
    for (int i = 0; i < stringIn.length(); i++) {
        if (stringIn.charAt(i) != c) {
            stringOut += stringIn.charAt(i);
        }
    }
    return stringOut;
}

Should I be using StringBuffers? Especially where repalceAll is not available for such objects anyway.

Thanks

Mr Morgan.

Thanks for all the advice. StringBuffers have been replaced with StringBuilders and Strings replaced with StringBuilders where I've thought it best.

Upvotes: 5

Views: 2891

Answers (6)

Mark Byers
Mark Byers

Reputation: 839124

You almost never need to use StringBuffer.

Instead of StringBuffer you probably mean StringBuilder. A StringBuffer is like a StringBuilder except that it also offers thread safety. This thread safety is rarely needed in practice and will just cause your code to run more slowly.

Your question doesn't seem to be about String vs StringBuffer, but about using built-in methods or implementing the code yourself. If there is a built-in method that does exactly what you want, you should probably use it. The chances are it is much better optimized than the code you would write.

Upvotes: 7

Stephen C
Stephen C

Reputation: 719596

There is no simple answer (apart from repeating the mantra of StringBuilder versus StringBuffer ... ). You really have understand a fair bit about what goes on "under the hood" in order to pick the most efficient solution.

In your first example, String is the way to go. The Java compiler can generate pretty much optimal code (using a StringBuilder if necessary) for any expression consisting of a sequence of String concatenations. And, if the strings that are concatenated are all constants or literals, the compiler can actually do the concatenation at compile time.

In your second example, it is not entirely clear whether String or StringBuilder would be better ... or whether they would be roughly equivalent. One would need to look at the code of the java.util.regex.Matcher class to figure this out.

EDIT - I looked at the code, and actually it makes little difference whether you use a String or StringBuilder as the source. Internally the Matcher.replaceAll method creates a new StringBuilder and fills it by appending chunks from the source String and the replacement String.

In your third example, a StringBuilder would clearly be best. A current generation Java compiler is not able to optimize the code (as written) to avoid creating a new String as each character is added.

Upvotes: 3

Andreas Dolk
Andreas Dolk

Reputation: 114817

Modern compilers optimize the code already. So some String additions will be optimized to use StringBuilder and we can keep the String additions if we think, it increases readibility.

Example 1:

String query = ("SELECT * " +
                "FROM User " +
                "WHERE userName = ?;");

will be optimized to somthing like:

StringBuiler sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.append("SELECT * ");
sb.append("FROM User ");
sb.append("WHERE userName = ?;");
String query = sb.toString();

Example 2:

String numbers = "";
for (int i = 0;i < 20; i++)
  numbers = numbers + i;

This can't be optimized and we should use a StringBuilder in code.

I made this observation for SUN jdk1.5+. So for older Java versions or different jdks it can be different. There it could be save to always code StringBuilder (or StringBuffer for jdk 1.4.2 and older).

Upvotes: 1

seand
seand

Reputation: 5296

Even in MT code, it's unusual to have multiple threads append stuff to a string. StringBuilder is almost always preferred to StringBuffer.

Upvotes: 1

bobah
bobah

Reputation: 18864

For cases which can be considered single threaded, the best would be StringBuilder. It does not add any synchronization overhead, while StringBuffer does.

String concatenation by '+' operator is "good" only when you're lazy to use StringBuilder or just want to keep the code easily readable and it is acceptable from performance point of view, like in startup log message "LOG.info("Starting instance " + inst_id + " of " + app_name);"

Upvotes: 0

bragboy
bragboy

Reputation: 35572

For the below segment of code

 // Removes a char from a String.
public static String removeChar(String stringIn, char c) {
    String stringOut = ("");
    for (int i = 0; i < stringIn.length(); i++) {
        if (stringIn.charAt(i) != c) {
            stringOut += stringIn.charAt(i);
        }
    }
    return stringOut;
}

You could just do stringIn.replaceAll(c+"","")

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions