Reputation: 884
My Swift / iOS9 framework 'viewer_protocol' uses another and external Objective-C framework (CocoaAsyncSocket). I'm using Carthage to build CocoaAsyncSocket. So far everything works fine: In have an example App inside my framework Xcode Project using my framework without any problems.
Now I want to use my Framework in a different Xcode Project - although using Carthage. I include only my Framework as a dependency and Carthage automatically resolves the dependencies to CocoaAsyncSocket. I embedded both frameworks into this new Xcode Project and build my App: Everything works fine here - except one warning I can't rid off:
/Users/John/Repositories/my_project/<module-includes>:1:1:
Umbrella header for module 'my_project' does not include header 'GCDAsyncSocket.h'
This is my framework header:
#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>
//! Project version number for my_project.
FOUNDATION_EXPORT double my_projectVersionNumber;
//! Project version string for my_project.
FOUNDATION_EXPORT const unsigned char my_projectVersionString[];
// In this header, you should import all the public headers of your framework
using statements like #import <my_project/PublicHeader.h>
#import <CocoaAsyncSocket/CocoaAsyncSocket.h>
As you can see CocoaAsyncSocket.h is imported. Furthermore inside my framework the CocoaAsyncSocket.h file is included:
What I am missing here? I'm using several others external frameworks inside my framework, there're no warnings for them - all of these external frameworks are written in Swift - CocoaAsyncSocket is pure Objective-C.
This is my frameworks module.modulemap:
framework module my_project {
umbrella header "my_project.h"
export *
module * { export * }
}
module viewer_protocol.Swift {
header "my_project-Swift.h"
}
Update
I found a solution: Changing the import statement in my framework header from
#import <CocoaAsyncSocket/CocoaAsyncSocket.h>
to
#import "CocoaAsyncSocket/CocoaAsyncSocket.h"
Now Xcode finds the header file and the warning disappears.
Upvotes: 65
Views: 50008
Reputation: 549
An error like this was driving me crazy for a while this afternoon.
It turned out that my umbrella header - the global one with all the imports of public headers in it - had somehow got set to be Private. This caused the module verifier to complain about all the headers included by it - which were actually fine - rather than about the global header itself.
Switching it back to Public fixed the problem.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 81
Deleting DerivedData did the trick for me. Try running the below command and see if it works.
rm -rf ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 91681
I had the same issue. Seemed to be related to old build files.
The standard Xcode problem fixer worked for me:
Product
> Clean Build Folder
)Upvotes: 30
Reputation: 35783
I had the same issue today
Umbrella header for module 'HockeySDK' does not include header 'BITHockeyBaseViewController.h'
and the solution was
1.build and run project and go-to Report Navigator
2.look at the warning, click to expand details
it will so you the file name where you need to make change as you can seen in below screen shot
So i just updated my import statement in AppDelegate.m file
New
#import "HockeySDK/HockeySDK.h"
Old
#import <HockeySDK/HockeySDK.h>
and issue gone..
hope this will help someone. who are coming here for solution.
Upvotes: 27
Reputation: 106
In my case (Obj-c framework):
Umbrella header for module 'opus' does not include header 'opus_multistream.h'
I needed to change:
@import opus.opus_defines;
into
@import opus;
(I don't have in #import "....h"
or #import <....h>
for frameworks)
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 2287
For others : In my case I already move the headers I want to expose from my framework, from "project" to "public" (Build phases of the framework target)
Then Xcode gave my this warning.
Xcode is telling us that we also need to add #import "name of header in the warning> in the public header file that was created with framework, so the clients (of the framework) will know this header.
So The Fix:
1.go to the framework public header file.(the one what created by xcode when you created the framework) .
2. add #import "the-name-of-the-header-in-the-warning.h"
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 775
Take a look at this post:
It goes over the concepts of the new module importing. I had my own custom framework and after adopting the new method to import objective-c framework
old:
#import <MyFramework/MyFramework.h>
new:
@import MyFramework;
it took care of the warning/
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 46703
Alternatively, you may have exposed files within the Public
area of your framework's build phases that should actually be moved back to the Project
area.
If you don't want those files to be within your framework's umbrella header so they're publicly accessible, you can revert this.
Goto Framework -> Target -> Build Phases and drag to move the unnecessary header files from Public to Project.
Upvotes: 14
Reputation: 10250
We got this recently and it was due to corruption in DerivedData. Deleting that folder fixed the problem.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 5762
For me the fix was rather simple, commit all your changes and build again. The warning disappeared.
Upvotes: -2
Reputation: 1281
trying to fix a archive build error led me to this error and post
my solution was real simple but took forever for me to figure out.
hope this helps someone! glhf!
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 548
I recently ran into same issue. Apparently I had header file set as public
in target membership, but it was not exposed in umbrella header. Fixed issue by making header file with project
access instead of public
.
Upvotes: 49
Reputation: 571
Just for completeness if your header is set to public in :
Build Phases > Headers
You should either
Include the import in your main header as others have mentioned
OR
Move that header to "private" if it doesn't need to be exposed
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 4405
For me the solution was as follows:
1) Each Objective C framework has 1 header file that contains all the:
#import ...
#import ...
#import ...
2) Make sure that this file imports the missing header.
3) Build the project again, it should remove the warning.
Upvotes: 16