Reputation: 29
I have an ontology that defines a new data type as pattern restriction on string type. This data type is then used as a property range restriction. Then a class is defined as a restriction on this property:
@prefix : <http://test.com/prop#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix xml: <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@base <http://test.com/prop> .
<http://test.com/prop> rdf:type owl:Ontology .
:MyType rdf:type rdfs:Datatype ;
owl:equivalentClass [ rdf:type rdfs:Datatype ;
owl:onDatatype xsd:string ;
owl:withRestrictions ( [ xsd:pattern "[a-zA-Z]*"
]
)
] .
# Properties
:hasProperty rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
:hasValue rdf:type owl:DatatypeProperty .
# Classes
:BaseClass rdf:type owl:Class .
:BaseProperty rdf:type owl:Class .
:MyClass rdf:type owl:Class ;
owl:equivalentClass [ rdf:type owl:Class ;
owl:intersectionOf ( :BaseClass
[ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
owl:onProperty :hasProperty ;
owl:someValuesFrom :MyProperty
]
)
] ;
rdfs:subClassOf :BaseClass .
:MyProperty rdf:type owl:Class ;
owl:equivalentClass [ rdf:type owl:Class ;
owl:intersectionOf ( :BaseProperty
[ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
owl:onProperty :hasValue ;
owl:someValuesFrom :MyType
]
)
] ;
rdfs:subClassOf :BaseProperty .
# Individuals
:Ind1 rdf:type :BaseClass ,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
:hasProperty :Prop1 .
:Prop1 rdf:type :BaseProperty ,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
:hasValue "Maier" .
The Protege crashes while classifying this ontology with Pellet reasoner:
UnsupportedOperationException: null
com.clarkparsia.pellet.datatypes.types.text.RestrictedTextDatatype.applyConstrainingFacet(RestrictedTextDatatype.java:93)
com.clarkparsia.pellet.datatypes.DatatypeReasonerImpl.getDataRange(DatatypeReasonerImpl.java:440)
The FaCT++ reasoner failed with exception:
ReasonerInternalException: Unsupported datatype 'http://test.com/prop#MyType'
uk.ac.manchester.cs.factplusplus.FaCTPlusPlus.getBuiltInDataType(Native Method)
The Pellet seems only to have trouble with the pattern as a restriction. The FaCT++ seems to have trouble with a user defined datatype.
Do I have errors in the ontology or the reasoners are not able to classify such pattern restriction?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 445
Reputation: 768
The current version of FaCT++ does not support user-defined datatypes. So the report from FaCT++ is correct.
Pellet should support user-defined datatypes, but your definition is incorrect. The owl:equivalentClass
construction is a) from the obsolete OWL 1 syntax, that doesn't support datatype definitions, and b) is only valid for classes, not datatypes. I would suggest to use OWL 2 syntax http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-syntax-20121211/ in your datatype definition.
Upvotes: 2