Reputation: 189
I want to predict a linear model, which I estimated by ols. However, it always forecasts the same time period ahead, which is of the same length as my data set.
Here is what I have done.
data <- ts(matrix(rnorm(144, mean=0, sd=1), ncol=6), start=c(2007,1), frequency=12)
I computed two factors.
factors <- ts(t(t(eigen(cor(data))$vectors[,1:2] %*%
sqrt(diag(eigen(cor(data))$values[1:2]))) %*%
t(scale(data))), start=c(2007,1), frequency=12)
colnames(factors) <- c("f1", "f2")
I combined the factors with the data set.
favar <- ts.union(factors, data)
colnames(favar) <- c(colnames(factors), "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f")
Then, I estimated a linear model for "a".
require(forecast)
model <- tslm(a ~ f1 + f2 + b + c + d + e + f + 0, data=ts(sapply(favar, function(x)
lag(x, h=1))[-1,], start=c(2007, 2), frequency=12))
If I now forecast my model, it takes the same length for the time period ahead as my data set.
forecast(model, newdata=favar, h=6, ts=T)
It doesn't matter what value I set for h
, the result is always a 24 month ahead forecast. I think, the problem occurs, because I have to provide the newdata
, for which I used my original data set favar
. However, if I try to forecast the model without it, I get the following error:
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object 'f1' not found
I've already tried to forecast it with predict.lm
and estimating the model only with lm
instead of tslm
. In any case, I face the same problem: the forecasting period is always the same as the length of the newdata
provided.
Update: I've just noticed that not only the length of my forecast is the same as my data set, but also the values. Basically, I have just a copy of my original data.
Thank you for your help.
Upvotes: 3
Views: 5055
Reputation: 2960
forecast(model, newdata=favar, h=6, ts=T)
calls forecast.lm
.
From the documentation for forecast.lm
:
newdata
An optional data frame in which to look for variables with which to predict. If omitted, it is assumed that the only variables are trend and season, and h forecasts are produced.
h
Number of periods for forecasting. Ignored if newdata present.
Hence the reason for the error
> forecast(model,h=6,ts=T)
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object 'f1' not found
>
is that the only variables known are trend
and season
, not f1
, f2
. etc.
So newdata
must not be missing and therefore h
is ignored.
I'm afraid to get a forecast of length 6 from the forecast
method you need some newdata
of length 6. Then the linear function determined by the coefficients coef(model)
is evaluated at these 6 points.
Of course you can ask the coefficients
> coef(model)
f1 f2 b c d e f
2.008211 1.344910 -0.532548 -1.375166 0.378199 2.169784 -1.971422
and use them without the forecast
method.
> myData <- X[1:6,-3] + matrix(sample(-100:100,6*7,,replace=TRUE)/100,6,7)
> myData
f1 f2 b c d e f
[1,] 1.3901181 0.5794323 0.2638713 1.7911077 -1.9140976 -0.1632654 1.2130388
[2,] -0.5106604 1.0037957 -0.5357955 1.1981059 -0.3636334 -1.2746126 -0.1845794
[3,] 2.0191347 -0.8724608 -1.7707524 0.2779736 1.2814462 -0.4834006 0.1504435
[4,] 1.4574348 0.2173202 -1.1881501 0.7911197 -0.7332919 -1.0103667 -0.8201907
[5,] -1.8129340 0.2294362 0.7379416 -1.3893631 0.5011054 0.4321159 0.4026663
[6,] 1.9659584 1.8596798 0.7286796 1.9930237 0.6643413 -0.2609216 -0.2635644
> fcst <- myData %*% coef(model)
> fcst
[,1]
[1,] -2.502231
[2,] -3.577032
[3,] 2.581397
[4,] 1.911273
[5,] -1.481277
[6,] 3.525071
> forecast(model,myData,ts=T)
Point Forecast Lo 80 Hi 80 Lo 95 Hi 95
Jan 2009 -2.502231 -2.502231 -2.502231 -2.502231 -2.502231
Feb 2009 -3.577032 -3.577032 -3.577032 -3.577032 -3.577032
Mar 2009 2.581397 2.581397 2.581397 2.581397 2.581397
Apr 2009 1.911273 1.911273 1.911273 1.911273 1.911273
May 2009 -1.481277 -1.481277 -1.481277 -1.481277 -1.481277
Jun 2009 3.525071 3.525071 3.525071 3.525071 3.525071
>
The name of the functionforecast
is a bit misleading. forecast
just calculates a forecasted value of a
if forecasted values of f1
,f2
,b
,c
,d
,e
and f
are given as newdata
.
Upvotes: 1