Reputation: 565
I'm using libpcap and libevent in a program.
the related source codes are:
const u_int16_t RELAY_PORT = 8000;
pcap_t *create_pcap(const void *dev, pcap_style_t style)
{
pcap_t *handle; /* Session handle */
struct bpf_program fp; /* The compiled filter */
bpf_u_int32 mask; /* The netmask */
bpf_u_int32 net; /* The IP subnet*/
const struct pcap_pkthdr* pcap_header; /* A pointer to pcap_pkthdr structure */
const u_char *pcap_packet; /* The captured packet */
char interface[20];
strcpy(interface, dev);
/* Find the properties for the network interface */
if (pcap_lookupnet(interface, &net, &mask, errbuf) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Pcap counldn't get netmask for device %s: %s\n", interface, errbuf);
net = 0;
mask = 0;
}
handle = pcap_open_live(interface, BUFSIZ, 0, 0, errbuf);
if (handle == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, "Pcap open live capture failure: %s\n", errbuf);
exit(1);
}
sprintf(filter_exp, "tcp[tcpflags] & (tcp-syn|tcp-ack) == (tcp-syn|tcp-ack) && src port %d || dst port %d", RELAY_PORT, RELAY_PORT);
/* Compile and apply the filter */
if (pcap_compile(handle, &fp, filter_exp, 0, mask) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Pcap parse filter failure: %s\n", pcap_geterr(handle));
exit(1);
}
if (pcap_setfilter(handle, &fp) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Pcap couldn't install filter: %s\n", pcap_geterr(handle));
exit(1);
}
if(style == NONBLOCKING){
if(pcap_setnonblock(handle, 1, errbuf) == -1){
fprintf(stderr, "Pcap set non-blocking fails: %s\n", errbuf);
exit(1);
}
}
return handle;
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////
void on_capture(int pcapfd, short op, void *arg)
{
int res;
printf("on capture \n");
pcap_t *handle;
handle = (pcap_t *)arg;
fqueue_t* pkt_queue;
/* put all packets in the buffer into the packet FIFO queue
* and then process these packets
* */
pkt_queue = init_fqueue();
res = pcap_dispatch(handle, -1, collect_pkt, (u_char *)pkt_queue);
printf("pcap_dispatch() returns %d\n", res);
if(!res) return;
process_packet(pkt_queue);
}
//////////////////
int pcapfd;
pcap_t *pcap_handle;
struct event pcap_ev;
pcap_handle = create_pcap("eth0", NONBLOCKING);
pcapfd = pcap_get_selectable_fd(pcap_handle);
if(pcapfd<0){
perror("pcap_get_selectable_fd() failed!\n");
exit(1);
}
if (setnonblock(pcapfd) == -1) return -1;
base = event_init();
event_set(&pcap_ev, pcapfd, EV_READ|EV_PERSIST, on_capture, pcap_handle);
event_base_set(base, &pcap_ev);
if(event_add(&pcap_ev, NULL) == -1){
perror("event_add() failed for pcap_ev!\n");
exit(-1);
}
event_base_dispatch(base);
---------------------------------------------
I also register two TCP events on event_base( on_accept and on_recv.)
then I run the program on host A and host B send packets to A, meanwhile I use a tcpdump to capture packets on A (tcpdump -i eth0 port 8000 )
For comparison, I have two laptops which acts as A, I tried the program (compile and then run) on these two laptops, one with Fedora (fedora release 18) and one with Ubuntu (Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS)
ubuntu: Linux 3.13.0-61-generic
fedora: Linux 3.11.10-100-fc18.x86_64
on ubuntu events are invoked in the following order
on capture
pcap_dispatch() returns 0
on capture
pcap_dispatch() returns 0
on accept
on recv
it is strange that the pcap_dispatch returns 0 twice. My expectation is that the when on_capture event is triggered, pcap_dispatch will catch TCP SYN packets before on_accept event is triggered (TCP packets are captured on NIC before handed over to TCP stack). But I don't know why the on_capture events are invoked twice and pcap_dispatch() returns 0.
on Fedora, the program works as expected, the pcap_dispatch() can capture packets the first time it is invoked before on_accept event.
I use ldd
to check the libraries of this program on each laptop.
Fedora:
$ldd relay
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff1d1ad000)
libevent-1.4.so.2 => /lib/libevent-1.4.so.2 (0x00007faca467d000)
libpcap.so.1 => /lib64/libpcap.so.1 (0x00000035b4a00000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000035b0a00000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib64/libnsl.so.1 (0x00000035cea00000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00000035b1a00000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00000035b2e00000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000035b0200000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00000035b1600000)
ubuntu:
$ ldd relay
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffd08bc5000)
libevent-2.0.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libevent-2.0.so.5 (0x00007eff35f81000)
libpcap.so.0.8 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.0.8 (0x00007eff35d43000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007eff3597e000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007eff35760000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007eff361c5000)
indeed, both libpcap and libevent versions are different. what are potential problems for my program when it runs on ubuntu? how can fix the unexpected problems on ubuntu? thank you!
Upvotes: 2
Views: 646
Reputation:
how the difference between libevent version 1.4 and 2.0 influence libpcap events?
It doesn't.
indeed, both libpcap and libevent versions are different
Yes; as you indicated in your email to me, the libpcap on Fedora is libpcap 1.3.0 and the libpcap on Ubuntu is libpcap 1.5.3.
Libpcap 1.3.0 doesn't support TPACKET_V3, and libpcap 1.5.3 does. The kernel on both your Fedora machine (3.11.10-100-fc18.x86_64, according to your email) and your Ubuntu machine (3.13.0-61-generic, according to your email) both support TPACKET_V3.
how can fix the unexpected problems on ubuntu?
Don't use a timeout of 0 in the pcap_open_live()
call. Due to the way TPACKET_V3 works, some bugs in how it works in older kernels (both of your kernels are "older" in that sense), and the way libpcap attempts to make non-blocking mode work, make a timeout of 0 work, and work around those bugs, a timeout of 0 may not work well. Try a timeout of, for example, 100 (for 1/10 of a second) or 10 (for 1/100 of a second).
Note that if a timeout of 0 works the way it's intended, it could be that an event for libpcap might not be delivered for an arbitrarily-long period of time, with the time period being longer the less traffic is captured, so it's rarely, if ever, a good idea to use a timeout of 0.
Upvotes: 1