Reputation: 51039
I would like some of my beans know something about test. SOMETHING. May be test class name or some of it's methods.
For example, suppose my test class has a method
public String getTestName() {
return getClass().getSimpleName();
}
This method returns test name and can be overridden.
Is it possible to inject this name into some beans of Spring context, to use during test?
For example, with autowire feature:
@Autowired
public String testName;
not only in test class, but in other beans too.
UPDATE
Below are two (failed) attempts to implement injecting testInstance
. May be there are some convenient ways to do that?
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(classes = TestClassAwareTry._Config.class)
@TestExecutionListeners(value = { TestClassAwareTry._Listener.class },
mergeMode = TestExecutionListeners.MergeMode.MERGE_WITH_DEFAULTS)
public class TestClassAwareTry {
/**
* Interface to tag beans, who want to know if they are in test
*/
public interface TestInstanceAware {
void setTestInstance(Object value);
}
/**
* Sample bean, which would like to know if it is in test
*/
public static class MyBean implements TestInstanceAware {
private Object testInstance;
{
System.out.println("MyBean constructed");
}
public void setTestInstance(Object value) {
this.testInstance = value;
System.out.println("testInstance set");
}
public Object getTestInstance() {
return testInstance;
}
}
/**
* Attempt to inject testInstance with a bean, implementing {@link BeanPostProcessor}
*/
public static class TestInstanceInjector implements BeanPostProcessor {
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
if( bean instanceof TestInstanceAware ) {
TestInstanceAware aware = (TestInstanceAware) bean;
// we don't have access to test instance here
// otherwise I would write
//Object testInstance = getTestInstance();
//aware.setTestInstance(testInstance);
}
return bean;
}
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
return bean;
}
}
/**
* Attempt to inject testInstance with test execution listener
*/
public static class _Listener extends AbstractTestExecutionListener {
@Override
public void prepareTestInstance(TestContext testContext) throws Exception {
Object testInstance = testContext.getTestInstance();
ApplicationContext context = testContext.getApplicationContext();
// we don't have setBean() method
// I would write if I have
// context.setBean("testInstance", context);
}
}
/**
* Java-based configuration
*/
@Configuration
public class _Config {
@Bean
public MyBean myBean() {
return new MyBean();
}
@Bean
public TestInstanceInjector testInstanceInjector() {
return new TestInstanceInjector();
// I would acquire test instance here and pass it to constructor, if I can
}
}
@Autowired
public MyBean myBean;
@Test
public void testInjected() {
assertSame( this, myBean.getTestInstance());
}
}
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1715
Reputation: 33
I've ended up creating ContextCustomizerFactory that registers BeanPostProcessor
package com.company.testing.base.spring;
import java.util.List;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.ConfigurableListableBeanFactory;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfigurationAttributes;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextCustomizer;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextCustomizerFactory;
public class TestAwareContextCustomizerFactory implements ContextCustomizerFactory {
@Override
public ContextCustomizer createContextCustomizer(
Class<?> testClass, List<ContextConfigurationAttributes> configAttributes) {
return (context, mergedConfig) -> {
ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory = context.getBeanFactory();
beanFactory.addBeanPostProcessor(
new TestInstanceAwareBeanPostProcessor(mergedConfig.getTestClass()));
};
}
}
TestInstanceAwareBeanPostProcessor
public class TestInstanceAwareBeanPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor {
private final Class<?> testClass;
TestInstanceAwareBeanPostProcessor(Class<?> testClass) {
this.testClass = testClass;
}
@Override
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
if (bean instanceof TestClassAware) {
((TestClassAware) bean).setTestClass(testClass);
}
return bean;
}
@Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
return bean;
}
}
resources/META-INF/spring.factories
# ContextCustomizerFactories for the Spring TestContext Framework
org.springframework.test.context.ContextCustomizerFactory = \
com.company.testing.base.spring.TestAwareContextCustomizerFactory
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 603
You can achieve this in a more elegant way using Spring Boot Auto configuration feature by making yours, this way:
define a Configuration
class that exposes or registers your bean this way:
@Configuration
public class MyBeanProviderConfiguration {
@ConditionalOnMissingBean
@Bean
public MyBean myBean() {
// return a fully initialised MyBean instance
}
}
Then define a custom annotation Spring Boot like, say @AutoConfigureMyBean
this way:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@ImportAutoConfiguration(MyBeanProviderConfiguration.class)
public @interface AutoConfigureMyBean {}
Then you can use this in your Spring test, here is an example:
@RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
@AutoConfigureMyBean
public class MyTest {
@Autowired
MyBean myBean;
}
Or also declare your MyBean @Autowired
dependent bean in a regular Spring test (using a Config class), A MyBean
instance will be automatically injected into it.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 14661
The only way I've been able to do this is by delaying creation of the subject until you are in the test method and to have the bean in the prototype scope.
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(classes = { LiveConfig.class, DevConfig.class})
@ActiveProfiles("Dev")
public class MeTest {
@Autowired
public ApplicationContext context;
@Autowired
DevConfig devConfig;
@Rule
public TestName nameRule = new TestName();
@Before
public void setName() {
devConfig.setSettings(nameRule.getMethodName());
}
@Test
public void test() {
Bean subject = context.getBean(Bean.class);
System.out.println(subject.settings);
assertThat(subject.settings, is(nameRule.getMethodName()));
}
@Test
public void test2() {
Bean subject = context.getBean(Bean.class);
System.out.println(subject.settings);
assertThat(subject.settings, is(nameRule.getMethodName()));
}
}
@Configuration
class LiveConfig {
@org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean
public String getSettings() {
return "/some/real/file.txt";
}
@org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean
@Scope(value = ConfigurableBeanFactory.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
public Bean getBean() {
return new Bean();
}
}
@Configuration
class DevConfig {
private String settings;
@org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean
@Profile("Dev")
@Scope(value = ConfigurableBeanFactory.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
public String getSettings() {
return settings;
}
public void setSettings(String settings) {
this.settings = settings;
}
}
class Bean {
public Bean() {
System.out.println("Bean");
}
String settings;
@Autowired
void setSettings(String settings) {
System.out.println("Settings: " + settings);
this.settings = settings;
}
}
This uses Profiles to change what Live sees and what the tests see, and the a NameRule to get the name. It is clunky.
I would NOT use the TestName rule, but rather the TemporaryFolder rule and use that to set whatever setting your application uses for the output folder. I'd also only use DI in a test in very rare cases (i.e. full blown integration tests).
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 7058
Do you mean like this?
public class MyTest {
@Test
public void testName() {
MyBean b = new MyBean(MyTest.class.getSimpleName());
b.doSomething();
}
}
Upvotes: 0