Reputation: 6544
I have a property of type boolean presented with checkbox.
I want to change that to two radiobuttons that bind on the same property presenting the value true/false.
How can that be done?
Upvotes: 53
Views: 53170
Reputation: 2580
Late answer but weve been doing it like this for years, firstly with WPF now with WinUI 3
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="Payment terms" />
<RadioButton
x:Name="rdo_on_account"
Content="Account"
GroupName="account"
IsChecked="{x:Bind ViewModel.IsOnAccount, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
<RadioButton
Content="Cash"
GroupName="account"
IsChecked="{Binding ElementName=rdo_on_account, Path=IsChecked, Converter={StaticResource BoolInvert}}" />
</StackPanel>
public class BoolInvert : IValueConverter
{
// convert the value to the destination format
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, string language)
{
if (value is bool)
{
if ((bool)value == true)
{
return false;
}
else
{
return true;
}
}
//not a bool
return value;
}
// convert from the destination format to the source format
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, string language)
{
return value;
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 373
From The answer of Mr-RandomQC
everything works fine. But when I click another radio in the same group. Then the opposite radio will show a Red box around the radio button.
I changed the code a little bit from his answer to return Binding.DoNothing
instead of return null
like this.
public class BoolRadioConverter : IValueConverter
{
public bool Inverse { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool)value;
return this.Inverse ? !boolValue : boolValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool)value;
if (!boolValue)
{
// Return Binding.DoNothing instead of Return null
return Binding.DoNothing;
}
return !this.Inverse;
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 121
When using MVVMLight
and DataContext
is set in XAML as:
DataContext="{Binding <Your ViewModel property name>, Source={StaticResource Locator}}"
BoolInverterConverter
causes Stack Overflow
second time the window gets opened.
The work around is to remove DataContext
from XAML and do it in code in window constructor after InitializeComponent()
:
DataContext = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<Your View Model class>();
After some testing it was not enough - Stack Overflow error could pop up randomly when clicking on radio button. The solution which worked for me - instead of the converter use another property for other radio button in a group:
public bool Is9to1 { get; set; }
public bool Is1to9 { get { return !Is9to1; } set { Is9to1 = !value; } }
in XAML:
<RadioButton GroupName="Is9to1" IsChecked="{Binding Is1to9}"/>
<RadioButton GroupName="Is9to1" IsChecked="{Binding Is9to1}"/>
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 57
Little upgrade of RandomEngy's answer if you want your bool nullable (for no default value/Checked Radiobutton)
public class BoolRadioConverter : IValueConverter
{
public bool Inverse { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool? boolValue = (bool?)value;
return this.Inverse ? !boolValue : boolValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool? boolValue = (bool?)value;
if (boolValue != null && (bool)!boolValue)
{
// We only care when the user clicks a radio button to select it.
return null;
}
return !this.Inverse;
}
}
and the rest is the same as his answer.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 672
Simplified version of ragunathan's answer.
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) =>
Convert(value);
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) =>
Convert(value);
private object Convert(object value) =>
value is bool ? !(bool)value : value;
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 15413
The standard binding approach has the unfortunate side effect of firing the binding setter as "unselected" whenever the UI is loaded. So if you've got code to handle the user's clicks in the setter for your bool, it will do some weird stuff like fire the setter to "false" even though you've bound it to a "true" bool.
I got around this with a converter used specifically for radio buttons:
public class BoolRadioConverter : IValueConverter
{
public bool Inverse { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool) value;
return this.Inverse ? !boolValue : boolValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool)value;
if (!boolValue)
{
// We only care when the user clicks a radio button to select it.
return null;
}
return !this.Inverse;
}
}
In your resources:
<converters:BoolRadioConverter x:Key="BoolRadioConverter" />
<converters:BoolRadioConverter x:Key="InverseBoolRadioConverter" Inverse="True" />
In your xaml:
<RadioButton
Content="True option"
GroupName="radioGroup1"
IsChecked="{Binding MyProperty,
Converter={StaticResource BoolRadioConverter}}" />
<RadioButton
Content="False option"
GroupName="radioGroup2"
IsChecked="{Binding MyProperty,
Converter={StaticResource InverseBoolRadioConverter}}" />
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 2015
<RadioButton GroupName="Group1"
IsChecked="{Binding PropertyValue}" Content="Yes" />
<RadioButton GroupName="Group1" Content="No"
IsChecked="{Binding PropertyValue,
Converter={StaticResource BoolInverterConverter}}" />
public class BoolInverterConverter : IValueConverter
{
#region IValueConverter Members
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
if (value is bool)
{
return !(bool)value;
}
return value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
if (value is bool)
{
return !(bool)value;
}
return value;
}
#endregion
}
Upvotes: 91
Reputation: 141
Here is the solution on how to bind radio buttons to any type (enumeration, Boolean, string, integer, etc.) with the sample code:
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/720497/Binding-Radio-Buttons-to-a-Single-Property
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 141
You can achieve this without a converter if you set the GroupName property of two radio button to the same value (so only one can be checked at the time). Then, set IsChecked of one radio button to "True", and bind IsChecked of another to your Boolean. Switching radio buttons will change the Boolean value, however, changing the Boolean value to False will not check the other radio button.
Thanks, Vlad
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 36775
You can use a value-converter that reverts the boolean value:
With that converter, bind one Checkbox.IsChecked-property to the boolean value without the converter and one CheckBox.IsChecked-property with the converter. This should do the trick.
Here the code for such a converter. I have copied it from here and added some lines of code. There you will find more information about.
public class BoolToOppositeBoolConverter : IValueConverter {
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) {
if (targetType != typeof(bool)) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("The target must be a boolean");
}
if (null == value) {
return null;
}
return !(bool)value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) {
if (targetType != typeof(bool)) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("The target must be a boolean");
}
if (null == value) {
return null;
}
return !(bool)value;
}
}
To use it, declare it in the resource-section.
<local:BoolToOppositeBoolConverter x:Key="BoolToOppositeBoolConverter_ValueConverter"/>
And the use it in the binding as a static resource:
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding YourProperty}" />
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding YourProperty,Converter={StaticResource BoolToOppositeBoolConverter_ValueConverter}}" />
Please note, the converter is only a simple example. Implement it neatly if you want to use it in productive code. I have not tested it. Make a comment if its not working.
Upvotes: 11