Reputation: 333
if I have 2 documents in my DocumentDB collection
'Document A'
{ "id": 123, "OtherDocId": 456, "Bdoc" : null }
and 'Document B'
{ "id": 456, "name": "" }
how can I I get Document A so that it looks like this
{ "id": 123, "OtherDocId": 456, "Bdoc" : { "id": 456, "name": "" }}
If it was SQL I could do somthing like
SELECT *, some-sub-query-here AS 'BDOC' from...
I'm not trying to turn a no-sql into a relational DB but I have a regularly updated document (Bdoc) that is associated with some of the documents in the collection and I don't want to have to do 2 round trips to get a document find it's Bdocid and then fetch it's associated Bdoc then put them together in some for loop.
If I do it straight nosql style then the Bdoc is copied in each of the A documents and Bdoc becomes a maintenance mess every time I want to update it since I have to update every document that Bdocid
Upvotes: 0
Views: 479
Reputation: 8119
You can't combine two separate documents using the SQL grammar (that effectively is a relational or cross-document join).
If you're looking to avoid 2 network round-trips, you could write a stored procedure that does two separate lookup and transformation.
Upvotes: 1