Reputation: 215497
Suppose I have a function which takes variadic arguments (...
) or a va_list
passed from another such function. The main logic is in this function itself (let's call it f1
), but I want to have it pass the va_list
to another function (let's call it f2
) which will determine the next argument type, obtain it using va_arg
, and properly convert and store it for the caller to use.
Is it sufficient to pass a va_list to f2
, or is it necessary to pass a pointer to va_list. Unless va_list is required to be an array type or else store its position data at the location the va_list
object points to (rather than in the object itself), I can't see how passing it by value could allow the calling function (f1
) to 'see' the changes the called function made by va_arg
.
Can anyone shed light on this? I'm interested in what the standard requires, not what some particular implementation allows.
Upvotes: 29
Views: 15759
Reputation: 1910
Neither, as va_list is either a pointer (eg x86) or an array (eg amd64); if you want to get rid of this ambiguity, wrap it into a structure, and pass the address of the structure.
typedef struct va_list_struct {
va_list ap; /* platform_dependent: pointer _or_ array */
} va_list_struct;
void function2 (va_list_struct *myap);
void function1_v (va_list ap)
{
va_list_struct myap;
va_copy (myap.ap, ap);
function2 (&myap);
va_end (myap.ap);
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 15586
You should pass a pointer to a va_list
if you want to use it in a subfunction and then not have to immediately pass it to va_end
afterwards. From C99:
It is permitted to create a pointer to a
va_list
and pass that pointer to another function, in which case the original function may make further use of the original list after the other function returns.
The standard allows this, however, on some 64-bit platforms where va_list
is an array type, this does not work. As the address of an array is the same as the address of the first element of the array, passing a pointer to the va_list
will segfault upon calling va_arg
with that pointer to va_list
as an argument.
A way to get around this is by receiving the va_list
as an unconventional argument name (usually suffixed with one or more underscores) and then creating a new local va_list
, like so:
#include <stdarg.h>
int vfoo(va_list ap_)
{
int ret;
va_list ap;
va_copy(ap, ap_);
ret = vbar(&ap);
/* do other stuff with ap */
va_end(ap);
return ret;
}
This is the approach I use in my vsnprintf
implementation to call other functions from it for formatting.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 172
Passing a pointer to va_list works fine in 32 bit system. You can even fetch one parameter a time in the sub-routine. But it doesn't seem to work in 64 bit system, will produce a segment fault at va_arg().
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 19236
Functions in standard C library pass va_list
element itself (man 3 vprintf
):
#include <stdarg.h>
int vprintf(const char *format, va_list ap);
int vfprintf(FILE *stream, const char *format, va_list ap);
int vsprintf(char *str, const char *format, va_list ap);
int vsnprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *format, va_list ap);
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 78953
I find the texts quite ambiguous on this question. The simplest is perhaps to look in the standard how predefined functions with va_list
are supposed to receive it, e.g vsnprintf
. And this is clearly by value and not by reference.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 86671
It looks like you'll need to pass a pointer to the va_list. For more info, see the C99 standard document section 7.15.In particular, bullet point 3 states:
The object ap may be passed as an argument to another function; if that function invokes the va_arg macro with parameter ap, the value of ap in the calling function is indeterminate and shall be passed to the va_end macro prior to any further reference to ap
[my italics]
Edit: Just noticed a footnote in the standard:
215) It is permitted to create a pointer to a va_list and pass that pointer to another function, in which case the original function may make further use of the original list after the other function returns
So you can pass a pointer to the va_list and do va_arg(*va_list_pointer)
in the called function.
Upvotes: 31
Reputation: 5256
In my understanding, you're supposed to pass the va_list directly (not a pointer to it). This seems to be supported by comp.lang.c:
"A va_list is not itself a variable argument list; it's really sort of a pointer to one. That is, a function which accepts a va_list is not itself varargs, nor vice versa. "
Upvotes: 2