Reputation: 27375
I have the following interface:
public interface MessageFactory<T extends Message> {
public T create(Session session);
}
when I define the class like this, Eclipse gives me the error in the comment below on that line:
public abstract class MessageType<T extends Message> implements MessageFactory<T>{
public static final MessageType<ObjectMessage> PLAYER_REGISTER = new MessageType<ObjectMessage>() {
@Override
public ObjectMessage create(Session session) { //Error, remove @Override annotation
//impl
}
};
private MessageType(){ }
}
But if I copy-and-paste the create
method from the interface into the class as an abstract method, the error goes away:
public abstract class MessageType<T extends Message> implements MessageFactory<T>{
public static final MessageType<ObjectMessage> PLAYER_REGISTER = new MessageType<ObjectMessage>() {
@Override
public ObjectMessage create(Session session) { //Fine
//impl
}
};
public abstract T create(Session session);
private MessageType(){ }
}
What's wrong with anonymous classes implementing interfaces?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 459
Reputation: 1074168
Looks like an IDE bug of some kind; Java's compiler is perfectly happy with it. If I set up that situation and use Oracle's Java8 javac
, it compiles just fine.
It's fine here on IDEOne using non-public classes, or if I create these files and compile them:
Message.java
:
public class Message { }
ObjectMessage.java
:
public class ObjectMessage extends Message { }
Session.java
:
public class Session { }
MessageFactory.java
:
public interface MessageFactory<T extends Message> {
public T create(Session session);
}
MessageType.java
:
public abstract class MessageType<T extends Message> implements MessageFactory<T>{
public static final MessageType<ObjectMessage> PLAYER_REGISTER = new MessageType<ObjectMessage>() {
@Override
public ObjectMessage create(Session session) { //Error, remove @Override annotation
return null;
}
};
private MessageType(){ }
}
Upvotes: 3