Reputation: 36120
Recently I've migrated to Arch Linux, after ~4 years being loyal to Ubuntu. Everything works like a charm, it's noticeably faster than Ubuntu, IMHO it's easier to customise, but when it is to do with support for R, well, Ubuntu takes a medal. I'm not willing to do another distro-shuffle and switch back to Ubuntu, while Debian is just "too stable" for my taste... so I'll stick with Arch for now.
Bunch of R packages available from Ubuntu's universe and/or multiverse repos (like r-cran-* and revolution-r) are not available in Arch. Of course, you can always install packages within R with install.packages
, but there are dozens of Debian/Ubuntu R packages, and excuse me for saying this, but it's painstaking job to track them down. r-cran-lattice
can be replaced with install.packages("lattice")
, but what about revolution-r
(revolution-mkl
)? I'd like to have RA optimizations in Arch.
Could you, please, give me some advice about this one? What's the catch? r-core
, r-base-dev
, r-base-core-dbg
, r-base-core-ra
... Actually, I have two questions:
r-base-*
)
packages and "standard" R
installation?r-cran-*
and Revolution-R-like packages)?It would be nice if Arch-ers could have out-of-the-box support for R, like Debian, Ubuntu, Suse and Fedora users. I know it's manageable, I just want to know how hard it is.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1242
Reputation: 368489
Quick ones:
Debian is just "too stable" is true only if you only look at Debian stable -- but you could pick Debian testing (as I do) which gets updated packages on a daily basis once they lasted for ten days on unstable. This works for me and has been for over a decade (!!). You also get cran2deb and 2400+ binary r-cran-* deb packages (currently i386 only)
difference between r-base-*
and "standard" R: none. I try hard to maintain these packages without deviances, yet you get little extras like tab completion etc
port from Arch: no idea, as Debian (and Ubuntu) work for me
In short, looks like you picked something different and now seem to notice it is different (as in "less complete support for R").
Upvotes: 3