Reputation: 669
I want to return the value from a dictionary if the key contains a string which half matches string lookup.
private readonly Dictionary<string, string> _ipAddressesDictionary = new Dictionary<string, string>()
{
{"ip.qwer4.abc5.somename", "6x.x.00.xx"},
{"ip.qwer3.abc1.somename", "6x.3.xx.xx"},
}
Forexample,
I have a string "abc1.somename", I am building up the logic as below - which doesn't work at the moment - to get me the value given key name contains that substring. I expect to get "6x.3.xx.xx" back.
public string LookUpPeerIp(string deviceName)
{
var value = _ipAddressesDictionary.Keys.Contains(deviceName);
return value.ToString();
}
Edit:
Sorry guys, forget to mention the string that is passed in to do a look up doesn't exactly match either. It has a .co.uk appended to it :(
So it will be abc1.somename.co.uk but the dictionary has ip.qwer3.abc1.somename without the .co.uk
Upvotes: 3
Views: 6508
Reputation: 1195
Try this online https://dotnetfiddle.net/q6E1wR
This will cutting right dots - My answer:
Usage:
Console.WriteLine("--first");
Console.WriteLine(LookupByPrefix("abc1.somename.co.uk"));
Console.WriteLine("--many");
string[] many = LookupByPrefixMany("abc1.somename.co.uk");
foreach(string ip in many)
Console.WriteLine(ip);
For single result:
public string LookupByPrefix(string domainName)
{
string[] dotDomains = domainName.Split('.');
for(int matchCount = dotDomains.Length; matchCount > 0; matchCount--)
{
string[] ret = LookUpPeerIpMany(string.Join(".", dotDomains.Take(matchCount)));
if(ret != null && ret.Length > 0) return ret.SingleOrDefault();
}
return null;
}
For multiple results:
public string[] LookupByPrefixMany(string domainName)
{
string[] dotDomains = domainName.Split('.');
for(int matchCount = dotDomains.Length; matchCount > 0; matchCount--)
{
string[] ret = LookUpPeerIpMany(string.Join(".", dotDomains.Take(matchCount)));
if(ret != null && ret.Length > 0) return ret;
}
return null;
}
Dependency:
public string[] LookUpPeerIpMany(string deviceName)
{
return _ipAddressesDictionary
.Where(q=>q.Key.Contains(deviceName)).Select(q=>q.Value).ToArray();
}
Happy to help you!
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 7618
First search for an exact match and then for a partial match.then use a regular expression
public string LookUpPeerIp(string deviceName)
{
string value = null;
_ipAddressesDictionary.TryGetValue(deviceName, out value);
if (value != null)
return value;
var keyPair = _ipAddressesDictionary.FirstOrDefault(k => k.Key.Contains(value));
if (keyPair != null)
return keyPair.Value;
string pattern = @"your pattern";
Regex rgx = new Regex(pattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
keyPair = _ipAddressesDictionary.FirstOrDefault(k => rgx.IsMatch(k.Key));
return keyPair != null ? keyPair.Value : null;
}
More on regular expression here
https://www.google.ie/?gws_rd=cr,ssl&ei=4z1XVv-oMsGsPMagotAG#q=c%23+regular+expressions
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 460058
public string LookUpPeerIp(string deviceName)
{
var keySubstringMatch = _ipAddressesDictionary.Keys
.FirstOrDefault(key => key.Contains(deviceName));
if(keySubstringMatch == null)
return null;
else
return _ipAddressesDictionary[keySubstringMatch];
}
maybe multiple matches are possible, then this would be a good approach:
public IEnumerable<string> LookUpPeerIp(string deviceName)
{
var keySubstringMatch = _ipAddressesDictionary.Keys
.Where(key => key.Contains(deviceName));
foreach (string key in keySubstringMatch)
yield return _ipAddressesDictionary[key];
}
Then you can process all matches, for example:
string allMatching = String.Join(",", LookUpPeerIp("abc1.somename"));
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 13248
This will do it:
string partial = "abc5";
string value= _ipAddressesDictionary.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Key.Contains(partial)).Value;
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 4016
If you want to return all the values (or the first value) for a key that contains part of a string, you have no other way other than iterate over all the keys and return the one that suits your needs. That would be O(N) in complexity.
If instead of a contains you can live with a begins with, then a dictionary is not a good choice. You will get better performance with a Trie. There is no built in implementation of a Trie in the framework, but there are a couple of open source implementations available out there.
Upvotes: 1