Reputation: 1
I'd like to know if anyone has found a solution for writing human-readable method tests names, so non-tech guys may read test list and they'll be able to understand what's going on, and, in instance, programmers won't need to use "non-tech-guy-friendly naming conventions" like "Whatever_Whatever2_Whatever3_DoesHelloWorldTest" anymore...?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 132
Reputation: 300769
There is a lot to be said for the clear and understandable convention:
MethodName_StateUnderTest_ExpectedBehavior
(not restricted to VS2010 or even .NET)
Upvotes: 3