Reputation: 979
The solutions I've seen online make sense; if you know the type of the variable, then you know the type of its value. Java makes it that way; however, if I have a system of inherited classes such as this ...
DynastyPQ (base class)
FirstPQ (inherited class)
And create the objects in this manner ...
DynastyPQ pq = new FirstPQ();
Is there a way to get the type of FirstPQ so that I can use it in a cast so that I can access the class's exclusive methods? Maybe something akin to this?
(typeof(pq's value)pq).exclusiveMethod()
Upvotes: 3
Views: 320
Reputation: 6441
There are a few options:
With the instanceof
operator:
if (pq instanceof FirstPQ) {((FirstPQ)pq).exclusiveMethod();}
With the Class.isInstance(Object obj)
instance method:
FirstPQ firstPQ;
if(pq.getClass().isInstance(firstPQ)) {
firstPQ = (FirstPQ)pq;
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 318
Try the getClass()
method.
This will return the run time class of the particular object.
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/java/lang/object_getclass.htm
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 15146
You have a few options.
instanceof
For these examples, we will attempt to find the type of this variable:
Object obj = new TargetType();
We want to see if the object referenced by obj
is of type TargetType
.
Reflection
There are a couple ways you could do this:
if(obj == TargetType.class) {
//do something
}
The idea behind the code above is that getClass()
returns a reference to the Class
object used to instantiate that object. You can compare the reference.
if(TargetType.class.isInstance(obj)) {
//do something
}
Class#isInstance
checks to see if the object value passed to method is an instance of the class we are calling isInstance
on. It will return false
if obj
null, so no null check is needed. This requires casting to perform operations on the object.
instanceof
This one is simple:
if(obj instanceof TargetType) {
//do something
}
instanceof
is part of the language specification. This returns false
if obj
is null. This requires casting to perform operations on the object.
Visitor Pattern
I have explained this in detail in one of my other answers. You would be in charge of handling null
. You should look deeper into the pattern to see if it's right for your situation, as it could be an overkill. This does not require casting.
Upvotes: 1