CODEWITHSUNDEEP
arraysperlsortingduplicates
gawbul
gawbul

Reputation: 1207

Sorting arrays of paired numbers and removing duplicates or overlaps?

How can I sort two arrays of coordinates in numerical order by the start coordinates e.g.

my @starts = (100,100,200,300,400,500,525);
my @ends   = (150,125,250,350,450,550,550);

but choose the biggest difference if there are two matching in either the starts or ends list? E.g.

my @uniq_starts = (100,200,300,400,500);
my @unique_ends = (150,250,350,450,550);

Any help greatly appreciated!

Also, how about if the lists are like this?

my @starts = (100,125,200,300,400,500,525);
my @ends   = (150,175,250,350,450,550,550);

This would give me the following for the in between values:

-25, 25, 50, 50, 50, -25

I would need the following output:

my @uniq_starts = (100,200,300,400,500);
my @unique_ends = (175,250,350,450,550);

So my in between values are:

25, 50, 50, 50

I can get around this by just removing and ignoring any negative values, as I can imagine this would make things much more complicated.

Upvotes: 2

Views: 353

Answers (3)

runrig
runrig

Reputation: 6524

How about using Set::IntSpan?

use Set::IntSpan;

my @starts = (100,100,200,300,400,500,525);
my @ends = (150,125,250,350,450,550,550);
my @spec = map { "$starts[$_]-$ends[$_]" } 0..$#starts;
my $p = Set::IntSpan->new(@spec);
print "$p\n";

Upvotes: 2

Hynek -Pichi- Vychodil
Hynek -Pichi- Vychodil

Reputation: 26121

Using Set::IntSpan:

use Set::IntSpan;

my @starts = (100,100,200,300,400,500,525);
my @ends   = (150,125,250,350,450,550,550);

my (@uniq_starts, @unique_ends);

for my $s (Set::IntSpan->new([map [$starts[$_], $ends[$_]], 0 .. $#starts])->spans) {
  push @uniq_starts, $s->[0];
  push @uniq_ends, $s->[1];
}

print join(",", @uniq_starts), "\n";
print join(",", @uniq_ends), "\n";

Or poor man's solution:

sub spans {
  my @s = sort {$a->[0] <=> $b->[0] or $a->[1] <=> $b->[1]} @_;
  my @res;
  while (@s > 1) {
    if ($s[0][1] >= $s[1][0]) {
      splice @s, 0, 2, [$s[0][0], $s[1][1]];
    } else {
      push @res, shift @s;
    }
  }
  push @res, @s;
  return @res;
}

my @starts = (100,100,200,300,400,500,525);
my @ends   = (150,125,250,350,450,550,550);

my (@uniq_starts, @unique_ends);

for my $s (spans(map [$starts[$_], $ends[$_]], 0 .. $#starts)) {
  push @uniq_starts, $s->[0];
  push @uniq_ends, $s->[1];
}

print join(",", @uniq_starts), "\n";
print join(",", @uniq_ends), "\n";

You can check that it works flawless.

More functional spans version:

sub spans {
  return spans_(sort {$a->[0] <=> $b->[0] or $a->[1] <=> $b->[1]} @_);
}

sub spans_ {
  if (@_ > 1 and $_[0][1] >= $_[1][0]) {
    splice @_, 0, 2, [$_[0][0], $_[1][1]];
    goto &spans_;
  } elsif (@_) {
    return shift, spans_(@_);
  } else {
    return;
  }
}

P.S.: If somebody thinks that perl is concise language, compare same algorithm spans function in erlang. I don't even know how it would look in APL or J:

spans(L) -> spans_(lists:sort(L)).

spans_([{A, B}, {C, D}|T]) when B >= C ->
  spans_([{A, D}|T]);
spans_([H|T]) -> [H|spans_(T)];
spans_([]) -> [].

Upvotes: 1

rubber boots
rubber boots

Reputation: 15204

Use some list transformations:

my @starts = (100,100,200,300,400,500,525);
my @ends   = (150,125,250,350,450,550,550);

my (%starts_seen, %ends_seen);
my @ar = sort { $a->[0] <=> $b->[0] }   # result in ascending sort order of @starts
         grep ! $starts_seen{$_->[0]}++,
         sort { $b->[0] <=> $a->[0] }   # descending sort b -> a
         grep ! $ends_seen{$_->[1]}++,
         sort { $b->[1] <=> $b->[1] }   # descending sort b -> a
         map  [ $starts[$_],$ends[$_] ],
         0 .. $#starts;

print "($_->[0],$_->[1]) " for @ar;

this results in:

(100,150) (200,250) (300,350) (400,450) (500,550)

Regards

rbo

Edit: modified code to reflect sort order of sorts

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions