User1
User1

Reputation: 41163

Using xargs to assign stdin to a variable

All that I really want to do is make sure everything in a pipeline succeeded and assign the last stdin to a variable. Consider the following dumbed down scenario:

x=`exit 1|cat`

When I run declare -a, I see this:

declare -a PIPESTATUS='([0]="0")'

I need some way to notice the exit 1, so I converted it to this:

exit 1|cat|xargs -I {} x={}

And declare -a gave me:

declare -a PIPESTATUS='([0]="1" [1]="0" [2]="0")'

That is what I wanted, so I tried to see what would happen if the exit 1 didn't happen:

echo 1|cat|xargs -I {} x={}

But it fails with:

xargs: x={}: No such file or directory

Is there any way to have xargs assign {} to x? What about other methods of having PIPESTATUS work and assigning the stdin to a variable?

Note: these examples are dumbed down. I'm not really doing an exit 1, echo 1 or a cat, but used these commands to simplify so we can focus on my particular issue.

Upvotes: 5

Views: 9848

Answers (6)

TRicks43
TRicks43

Reputation: 149

Assign each line of input to an array, e.g. all python files in a directory

declare -a pyFiles=($(ls -l *.py | awk '{print $9}')) 

where $9 is the nineth field in ls -l corresponding to the filename

Upvotes: 0

will
will

Reputation: 5061

There are already a few helpful solutions. It turns out that I actually had an example that matches the question as framed above; close-enough anyway.

Consider this:

 XX=$(ls -l *.cpp | wc -l  | xargs -I{} echo {})
 echo $XX
 3

Meaning that I had 3 x .cpp files to in my working directory. Now $XX is 3 and I can make use of that result in my script. It is contrived, because I don't actually need the xargs in this example. It works though.

In the example from the question ...

x=`exit 1|cat`

I don't think that will give you what was specified. exit will quit the sub-shell before the cat gets a mention. Also on that note,

I might start with something like

declare -a PIPESTATUS='([0]="0")'
x=$?

x now has the status from the last command.

Upvotes: 0

timo
timo

Reputation: 1

Why not just populate a new array?

IFS=$'\n' read -r -d '' -a result < <(echo a | cat | cat; echo "PIPESTATUS='${PIPESTATUS[*]}'" )
IFS=$'\n' read -r -d '' -a result < <(echo a | exit 1 | cat; echo "PIPESTATUS='${PIPESTATUS[*]}'" )

echo "${#result[@]}"
echo "${result[@]}"
echo "${result[0]}"
echo "${result[1]}"

Upvotes: 0

Douglas Leeder
Douglas Leeder

Reputation: 53310

xargs is run in a child process, as are all the commands you call. So they can't effect the environment of your shell.

You might be able to do something with named pipes (mkfifo), or possible bash's read function?

EDIT:

Maybe just redirect the output to a file, then you can use PIPESTATUS:

command1 | command2 | command3 >/tmp/tmpfile
## Examine PIPESTATUS
X=$(cat /tmp/tmpfile)

Upvotes: 3

timo
timo

Reputation: 1

How about ...

read x <<<"$(echo 1)"
read x < <(echo 1)

echo "$x"

Upvotes: 0

Dennis Williamson
Dennis Williamson

Reputation: 359985

When you use backticks (or the preferred $()) you're running those commands in a subshell. The PIPESTATUS you're getting is for the assignment rather than the piped commands in the subshell.

When you use xargs, it knows nothing about the shell so it can't make variable assignments.

Try set -o pipefail then you can get the status from $?.

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions