Shevek
Shevek

Reputation: 4063

C# Null coalesce with LINQ

I have 2 classes which looks like this:

class Widget
{
    string Selected { get; set; }

    List<Option> Options { get; set; }
}

class Option
{
    string InternalCode { get; set; }

    string ExternalCode { get; set; }
}

Options gets populated dynamically with different data per client for showing ExternalCode as options

Selected gets populated with ExternalCode.

I then need to access the InternalCode which matches.

At present I am doing this:

var option = widget.Options.SingleOrDefault(o => o.ExternalCode == widget.Selected);

var internalCode = option == null ? string.Empty : option.InternalCode;

Is this possible using a single line using Null Coalesce?

Upvotes: 8

Views: 23214

Answers (4)

Patrick Hofman
Patrick Hofman

Reputation: 156978

Yes, you can use the null propagation and null coalescing operator, which suits your needs if you can use C# 6:

var option = widget.Options
             .SingleOrDefault(o => o.ExternalCode == widget.Selected)?.InternalCode
             ?? string.Empty;

The ?. will translate to your use of the option == null ? part.

Upvotes: 18

Michael R&#228;tzel
Michael R&#228;tzel

Reputation: 411

Is this possible using a single line using Null Coalesce?

Yes, here is how:

var option = (widget.Options.SingleOrDefault(o => o.ExternalCode == widget.Selected) ?? new Option() { InternalCode = string.Empty }).InternalCode;

The other answers using a single statement I have seen so far yield wrong results in cases where there is a matching instance of Option with InternalCode == null

Upvotes: 0

Jon Skeet
Jon Skeet

Reputation: 1500595

Sure, with a small change:

var option = widget.Options
                   .Where(o => o.ExternalCode == widget.Selected)
                   .Select(o => o.InternalCode)
                   .FirstOrDefault() ?? "";

In other words, project the sequence of matching options to a sequence of internal codes, and then take the first of those, defaulting to null... which allows you to use the null-coalescing operator on the result.

You can use the null-conditional operator as per Patrick's answer instead, but personally I'd prefer the code in this answer - I think it's simpler to understand.

Upvotes: 10

Kirill Bestemyanov
Kirill Bestemyanov

Reputation: 11964

You can do this if you wrote extension method:

public static class MonadExtensions
{
    public static TResult With<TSource, TResult>(TSource source, Func<TSource, TResult> action) where TSource : class
        {
            if (source != default(TSource))
                return action(source);
            return default(TResult);
        }
}

And use it:

var internalCode  = widget.Options.SingleOrDefault(o => o.ExternalCode == widget.Selected).With(o=>o.InternalCode)??"";

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions