Reputation: 2276
My data set is following:
{ "_id" : "EVNQUERY-k9Uoo74Q3WcdmU", "event_data" : "{\"data\":\"helo\"}", "event_name" : "onOemPushAlert", "timestamp_start" : 1452678481433, "timestamp_end" : 1452678481433, "sender" : "USR-ADMIN", "status" : "pending", "query" : { "user" : { "and" : [ { "email" : { "eq" : "" } } ] } }, "updated_on" : ISODate("2016-01-13T09:48:01.459Z"), "created_on" : ISODate("2016-01-13T09:48:01.459Z") }
{ "_id" : "EVNQUERY-yAKmrbzs2JeaUY", "event_data" : "{\"data\":\"ji\"}", "event_name" : "onOemPushAlert", "timestamp_start" : 1452681060159, "timestamp_end" : 1452681060159, "sender" : "USR-ADMIN", "status" : "pending", "query" : { "user" : { "@@@and@@@" : [ { "email" : { "eq" : "" } } ] } }, "updated_on" : ISODate("2016-01-13T10:31:00.223Z"), "created_on" : ISODate("2016-01-13T10:31:00.223Z") }
{ "_id" : "EVNQUERY-0NeCstt2eJchDZ", "event_data" : "{\"data\":\"hyg\"}", "event_name" : "onOemPushAlert", "timestamp_start" : 1452681073882, "timestamp_end" : 1452681073882, "sender" : "USR-ADMIN", "status" : "pending", "query" : { "user" : { "@@@and@@@" : [ { "email" : { "eq" : "" } } ] } }, "updated_on" : ISODate("2016-01-13T10:31:13.897Z"), "created_on" : ISODate("2016-01-13T10:31:13.897Z") }
and i am running following query
db.eventqueries.find({},{_id:1})
but it give me
{ "_id" : "EVNQUERY-k9Uoo74Q3WcdmU" }
{ "_id" : "EVNQUERY-yAKmrbzs2JeaUY" }
{ "_id" : "EVNQUERY-0NeCstt2eJchDZ" }
but what i want is
["EVNQUERY-k9Uoo74Q3WcdmU", "EVNQUERY-yAKmrbzs2JeaUY", "EVNQUERY-0NeCstt2eJchDZ"]
Upvotes: 1
Views: 129
Reputation: 3956
You can use aggregation to achieve what you want. You can try this out
db.eventqueries.aggregate([
{
$group : {
keys : { $push : "_id" }
}
}
])
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 103365
Perform a distinct()
query against the _id
field on the collection:
db.eventqueries.distinct("_id")
In the node.js driver run the distinct()
command which would have a callback with the results:
collection.distinct("_id", function(err, docs) {
if (err) { /* handle error */ };
console.log(docs);
});
Upvotes: 1