CODEWITHSUNDEEP
nosqlstorage
fang
fang

Reputation: 617

What is the best database/storage to store statistic data?

I'm having a system that collects real-time Apache log data from about 90-100 Web Servers. I had also defined some url patterns.

Now I want to build another system that updates the time of occurrence of each pattern based on those logs.

I had thought about using MySQL to store statistic data, update them by statement: "Update table set count=count+1 where ....",

but i'm afraid that MySQL will be slow for data from such amount of servers. Moreover, I'm looking for some database/storage solutions that more scalable and simple. (As a RDBMS, MySQL supports too much things that I don't need in this situation) . Do you have any idea ?

Upvotes: 2

Views: 3967

Answers (2)

fang
fang

Reputation: 617

Key value storage seems to be an appropriate solution for my system. After taking a quick look on those storages, I'm concerning about race-condition issue, as there will be a lot of clients trying to do these steps on the same key:

  1. count = storage.get(key)
  2. storage.set(key,count+1)

I had worked with Tokyo Cabinet before, and they have 'addint' method which perfectly matched with my case, I wonder if other storages have similar feature? I didn't choose Tokyo Cabinet/Tyrant cause I had experienced some issues about its scalability and data stability (e.g. repair corrupted data, ...)

Upvotes: 0

Niels van der Rest
Niels van der Rest

Reputation: 32184

Apache Cassandra is a high-performance column-family store and can scale extremely well. The learning curve is a bit steep, but will have no problem handling large amounts of data.

A more simple solution would be a key-value store, like Redis. It's easier to understand than Cassandra. Redis only seems to support master-slave replication as a way to scale, so the write performance of your master server could be a bottleneck. Riak has a decentralized architecture without any central nodes. It has no single point of failure nor any bottlenecks, so it's easier to scale out.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions