Reputation: 2580
Yes, it is obvious fact that 2*n = O(n)
, and O(n)
is shorter notation than O(2*n)
, but if we write O(2*n)
- would it be incorrect?
I don't see any conflicts in the definition...
There exists M
:
|2*n| <= M * |2*n|
for all x >= x0
Or it would be just not accepted in math/programming community to write like that?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 40
Reputation: 77475
By definition,
O(n) = O(2n)
because n in O(2n)
and 2n in O(n)
.
thus both is correct. But it is convention to use the shortest notation of a class, and if you are asked about the complexity class in a test, they may be referring to the shortest name.
Upvotes: 2