Reputation: 21625
For example...
import numpy as np
from scipy.sparse import csr_matrix
X = csr_matrix([[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9]])
Y = csr_matrix([[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9], [11,12,13]])
# Print matrices
X.toarray()
[[1, 2, 3],
[4, 5, 6],
[7, 8, 9]]
Y.toarray()
[[ 1, 2, 3],
[ 4, 5, 6],
[ 7, 8, 9],
[11, 12, 13]]
I have a set of pairs of indices (x,y) representing a row from X
and a row from Y
. I'd like to take the dot product of the corresponding rows, but I can't figure out how to do this efficiently.
Here's what I've tried
# build arbitrary combinations of row from X and row from Y. Need to calculate dot product of each pair
x_idxs = np.array([2,2,1,0])
y_idxs = np.arange(Y.shape[0])
# current method (slow)
def get_dot_product(x_idx, y_idx):
return np.dot(X[x_idx].toarray()[0], Y[y_idx].toarray()[0])
func_args = np.transpose(np.array([x_idxs, y_idxs]))
np.apply_along_axis(func1d=lambda x: get_dot_product(x[0], x[1]), axis=1, arr=func_args)
which works but is slow as X
and Y
get large. Is there a more efficient way?
Following Warren's elegant but slow solution, here's a better example for testing (along with a benchmark)
X = csr_matrix(np.tile(np.repeat(1, 50000),(10000,1)))
Y = X
y_idxs = np.arange(Y.shape[0])
x_idxs = y_idxs
import time
start_time = time.time()
func_args = np.transpose(np.array([x_idxs, y_idxs]))
bg = np.apply_along_axis(func1d=lambda x: get_dot_product(x[0], x[1]), axis=1, arr=func_args)
print("--- %s seconds ---" % (time.time() - start_time)) # 15.48 seconds
start_time = time.time()
ww = X[x_idxs].multiply(Y[y_idxs]).sum(axis=1)
print("--- %s seconds ---" % (time.time() - start_time)) # 38.29 seconds
Upvotes: 2
Views: 542
Reputation: 114781
With your X
, Y
, x_idxs
and y_idxs
, you can do:
In [160]: X[x_idxs].multiply(Y[y_idxs]).sum(axis=1)
Out[160]:
matrix([[ 50],
[122],
[122],
[ 74]])
That uses "fancy" indexing (i.e. indexing with an arbitrary sequence to pull out the desired set of rows), followed by pointwise multiplication and a sum along axis 1 to compute the dot products.
The result is in a numpy matrix
, which you can convert to a regular numpy array and flatten as needed. You could even use the somewhat cryptic A1
attribute (a shortcut for the getA1
method):
In [178]: p = X[x_idxs].multiply(Y[y_idxs]).sum(axis=1)
In [179]: p
Out[179]:
matrix([[ 50],
[122],
[122],
[ 74]])
In [180]: p.A1
Out[180]: array([ 50, 122, 122, 74])
Update, with timing...
Here's a complete script to compare the performance of my version with the original, using arrays X
and Y
that are actually sparse (with density approximately 0.001, i.e. about 0.1% nonzero elements).
import numpy as np
from scipy import sparse
def get_dot_product(x_idx, y_idx):
return np.dot(X[x_idx].toarray()[0], Y[y_idx].toarray()[0])
print("Generating random sparse integer matrix X...")
X = (100000*sparse.rand(50000, 120000, density=0.001, format='csr')).astype(np.int64)
X.eliminate_zeros()
print("X has shape %s with %s nonzero elements." % (X.shape, X.nnz))
Y = X
y_idxs = np.arange(Y.shape[0])
x_idxs = y_idxs
import time
start_time = time.time()
func_args = np.transpose(np.array([x_idxs, y_idxs]))
bg = np.apply_along_axis(func1d=lambda x: get_dot_product(x[0], x[1]), axis=1, arr=func_args)
print("--- %8.5f seconds ---" % (time.time() - start_time))
start_time = time.time()
ww = X[x_idxs].multiply(Y[y_idxs]).sum(axis=1)
print("--- %8.5f seconds ---" % (time.time() - start_time))
Output:
Generating random sparse integer matrix X...
X has shape (50000, 120000) with 5999934 nonzero elements.
--- 18.29916 seconds ---
--- 0.32749 seconds ---
For less sparse matrices, the speed difference is not so large, and for sufficiently dense matrices, the original version is faster.
Upvotes: 4