Reputation: 451
I've been trying to wrap my head around polymorphism in C++ From what I understand, it goes like this
class Base {
//...
public:
virtual int Foo() {...} = 0;
};
//...
class Derived: public Base { //Could be protected or private as well
//...
public:
int Foo() {...}
};
I also know that when we have an array of dynamically allocated objects, we must call delete [] arr at the end of the program after we delete each individual entry of the array.
So when I run the following program, I'm not sure why I get a memory leak
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class Number {
public:
~Number() {
cout << "Expression deleted" << endl;
}
virtual void print() = 0;
};
class Int: public Number {
private:
int num;
public:
Int(int n) {
num = n;
}
void print() {
cout << "Num: " << num << endl;
}
~Int() {
cout << "Number deleted" << endl;
}
};
int main() {
Number *arr[10];
arr[0] = new Int(1);
arr[1] = new Int(2);
arr[2] = new Int(3);
arr[0]->print();
arr[1]->print();
arr[2]->print();
delete arr[0];
delete arr[1];
delete arr[2];
delete [] arr;
}
It first gives me a warning when compiling
poly.cc: In function 'int main()':
poly.cc:37:12: warning: deleting array 'Number* arr [10]' [enabled by default]
Then when I run it, it gives me this
Num: 1
Num: 2
Num: 3
Expression deleted
Expression deleted
Expression deleted
*** glibc detected *** ./a.out: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x00007fff785732d0 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x7db26)[0x7f9274641b26]
./a.out[0x400b07]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed)[0x7f92745e576d]
./a.out[0x400959]
======= Memory map: ========
00400000-00401000 r-xp 00000000 00:32 43144247
00601000-00602000 r--p 00001000 00:32 43144247
00602000-00603000 rw-p 00002000 00:32 43144247
01b5f000-01b91000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap]
7f92740b1000-7f92740c7000 r-xp 00000000 fc:00 50593804 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f92740c7000-7f92742c6000 ---p 00016000 fc:00 50593804 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f92742c6000-7f92742c7000 r--p 00015000 fc:00 50593804 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f92742c7000-7f92742c8000 rw-p 00016000 fc:00 50593804 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f92742c8000-7f92743c3000 r-xp 00000000 fc:00 50602224 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.15.so
7f92743c3000-7f92745c2000 ---p 000fb000 fc:00 50602224 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.15.so
7f92745c2000-7f92745c3000 r--p 000fa000 fc:00 50602224 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.15.so
7f92745c3000-7f92745c4000 rw-p 000fb000 fc:00 50602224 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.15.so
7f92745c4000-7f9274778000 r-xp 00000000 fc:00 50602238 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f9274778000-7f9274977000 ---p 001b4000 fc:00 50602238 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f9274977000-7f927497b000 r--p 001b3000 fc:00 50602238 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f927497b000-7f927497d000 rw-p 001b7000 fc:00 50602238 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f927497d000-7f9274982000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
7f9274982000-7f9274a84000 r-xp 00000000 fc:00 41962840 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
7f9274a84000-7f9274c83000 ---p 00102000 fc:00 41962840 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
7f9274c83000-7f9274c8b000 r--p 00101000 fc:00 41962840 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
7f9274c8b000-7f9274c8d000 rw-p 00109000 fc:00 41962840 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
7f9274c8d000-7f9274c90000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
7f9274c90000-7f9274cb2000 r-xp 00000000 fc:00 50602228 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
7f9274e84000-7f9274e89000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
7f9274eae000-7f9274eb2000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
7f9274eb2000-7f9274eb3000 r--p 00022000 fc:00 50602228 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
7f9274eb3000-7f9274eb5000 rw-p 00023000 fc:00 50602228 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
7fff78553000-7fff78574000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
7fff785c7000-7fff785c9000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso]
ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vsyscall]
Aborted
It seems that the objects are being added and deleted successfully. I can't see what's wrong.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 481
Reputation: 62613
Because for every polymoprhic class you need to define a virtual destructor. Otherwise deleting a derived class through a pointer to base class will not call derived class destructor.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 303537
There are two problems here. First, this is invalid:
delete [] arr;
arr
wasn't new[]
-ed so it doesn't need to be delete[]
-ed. arr
is just on the stack. That's why your compiler gave you the warning! (clang straight up errors). Good rule of thumb is to not ignore compiler warnings.
A second problem is here:
~Number() {
cout << "Expression deleted" << endl;
}
When you delete
a Number
, ~Number()
will be executed and that memory will be freed up... but not ~Int()
. You need to make the destructor virtual
too if you're going to be deleting the base class pointers. This should've led to a warning as well, something like:
main.cpp: In function 'int main()':
main.cpp:37:14: warning: deleting object of abstract class type 'Number' which has non-virtual destructor will cause undefined behaviour [-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor]
delete arr[0];
^
Upvotes: 6