Reputation: 31
Consider a database schema with three relations:
Employee (*eid:integer*, ename:string, age:integer, salary:real)
Works (*eid:integer*, *did:integer*, pct_time:integer)
Department(*did:integer*, dname:string, budget:real, managerid:integer)
Query the view above to find the name of the manager who manages most employees. If thesame employee works in several departments, that employee is counted once in each of the departments. The manager is included in the count the same as all other employees, i.e., based on his or her records in the Works table.
Why do I get this error:
ORDER BY SUM (EmpCount) DESC)
*
ERROR at line 6: ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
Here is my query:
SELECT distinct(MgrName)
FROM ManagerSummary
WHERE MgrID = (SELECT MgrID
FROM ManagerSummary
GROUP BY MgrID
ORDER BY SUM (EmpCount) DESC
LIMIT 1 );
The view is:
CREATE VIEW ManagerSummary (DeptName, MgrID, MgrName, MgrSalary, EmpCount)
AS SELECT d.dname, d.managerid, e.ename, e.salary,
(SELECT COUNT (w.did)
FROM works w
WHERE w.did = d.did
GROUP BY w.did)
FROM employee e, department d WHERE d.managerid = e.eid;
Thank you
Update: Changing LIMIT 1 for WHERE ROWNUM = 1 doesn't help
Upvotes: 0
Views: 308
Reputation: 4375
Try this
SELECT DISTINCT (MgrName)
FROM ManagerSummary
WHERE MgrID = (SELECT MgrId
FROM ( SELECT MgrId, SUM (empcount) AS maxemp
FROM ManagerSummary
GROUP BY MgrId
ORDER BY SUM (empcount) DESC)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 712
SELECT mgrname
FROM (SELECT mgrname, numemps
FROM (SELECT mgrname, count(*) numemps
FROM mgrsummary
GROUP BY mgrname)
ORDER BY NUMEMPS desc);
Just noticed - this is based on a view. This is ~not~ going to perform well.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1269513
You seem to want the name of the manager that has the most employees.
My guess is that you can do this in Oracle as:
select ms.MgrName
from (select ms.*
from ManagerSummary ms
order by EmpCount desc
) ms
where rownum = 1;
It is hard for me to envision a table called ManagerSummary
that would have more than one row per MgrId
. That's why I don't think aggregation is necessary.
Upvotes: 0