oligofren
oligofren

Reputation: 22963

Getting errors when Browsery bundle with SquishIt

I am currently refactoring the javascript portions of a web site, and now I have bundled some scripts together using Browserify. The resulting script is bundled along with other resources using SquishIt. In Debug mode, when SquishIt is not bundling all the scripts together everything seems to work just fine, but when running in Production, and SquishIt bundles everything together I get errors from the Browserify part of my bundle. The error is complaining that r has no length property (see line 18) below. This part of the code is created by Browserify when bundling the scripts.

(function e(t, n, r) { function s(o, u) { if (!n[o]) { if (!t[o]) { var a = typeof require == "function" && require; if (!u && a) return a(o, !0); if (i) return i(o, !0); var f = new Error("Cannot find module '" + o + "'"); throw f.code = "MODULE_NOT_FOUND", f } var l = n[o] = { exports: {} }; t[o][0].call(l.exports, function(e) { var n = t[o][1][e]; return s(n ? n : e) }, l, l.exports, e, t, n, r) } return n[o].exports } var i = typeof require == "function" && require; for (var o = 0; o < r.length; o++) s(r[o]); return s })({

I really can't think of anything that using SquishIt to bundle all the scripts would break the logic of the browserified scripts. What could be the cause of this? This gist shows the entire source code, in case that is relevant.

I have not changed anything on the ASP.NET side (in the bundling), and the relevant part of my ´Head.ascx´ looks like this:

 Bundle.JavaScript() 
 .Add(Assets.JavaScript.GetUrl("main.js").ToString()) 
 .Add(Assets.JavaScript.GetUrl("Plugins/raphael-min.js").ToString()) 
 .Add(Assets.JavaScript.GetUrl("Plugins/vector_map.js").ToString()) 
 // more ...
 .Render("~/Content/"+Assets.VersionString+"/Scripts/Combined/combined.js")

Upvotes: 0

Views: 222

Answers (1)

AlexCuse
AlexCuse

Reputation: 18306

Have a look at this comment it may help https://github.com/jetheredge/SquishIt/issues/320#issuecomment-139921409

Is there a reason you need to use two different bundling solutions?

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions