Reputation: 18869
It seems that when you use Entity Framework, it automatically creates a connection string of provider System.Data.EntityClient
.
So I end up with two connection strings connecting to the same database in my config:
<add connectionString="Server=S;Database=D;User ID=U;Password=P" name="DBConn" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
<add connectionString="metadata=res://*/Entities.csdl|res://*/Entities.ssdl|res://*/Entities.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="data source=S;initial catalog=D;user id=U;password=P;MultipleActiveResultSets=True;App=EntityFramework"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" name="MyEntities" />
Is there any way to consolidate these by having my entities connect to the first, standard connection string instead of the System.Data.EntityClient
connection?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 157
Reputation: 2792
You haven't said if you are using Code-First or Database-First, but you can pass a standard connection string into the DbContext class constructor.
public class MyDbContext : DbContext
{
public MyDbContext() : base("My Connection String")
{
I am not a fan of hard-coding connection strings, so I'll generally create a static class that has a static field that is initialized using whatever logic gets my connection string. In that case, your DbContext class would look something like:
public class MyDbContext : DbContext
{
public MyDbContext() : base(SomeStaticClass.MyConnectionString)
{
Upvotes: 2