Reputation: 9341
I am building a way to display a dialog to users.
data DialogConfig t m b e =
DialogConfig { _dialogConfig_title :: Dynamic t T.Text
, _dialogConfig_content :: b -> m (Dynamic t (Maybe b))
, _dialogConfig_footer :: Dynamic t (Maybe b) -> m (Event t e)
}
dialog :: MonadWidget t m =>
DialogConfig t m b e -> Event t b -> m (Event t (DialogEvent e))
I would like to use some kind of 'default' instance to initialize DialogConfig
for the dialog
function, so that I could use it as e.g. defaultConfig{_dialogConfig_content=content}
. However, I'm fighting with type inferrence. This works:
confirmDialog :: forall t m. MonadWidget t m =>
T.Text -> Event t T.Text -> m (Event t ())
...
evt <- dialog
(DialogConfig { _dialogConfig_title = constDyn title
, _dialogConfig_content = content
, _dialogConfig_footer = buttons}
) contentEvt
However, when I use some default DialogConfig
(e.g. here directly inlining it), it doesn't:
evt <- dialog
(DialogConfig { _dialogConfig_title = constDyn mempty
, _dialogConfig_content = const $ return $ constDyn Nothing
, _dialogConfig_footer = const $ return never }
{ _dialogConfig_title = constDyn title
, _dialogConfig_content = content
, _dialogConfig_footer = buttons}
) contentEvt
The errors are:
Could not deduce (Reflex t0) arising from a use of ‘constDyn’ from the context (MonadWidget t m)
Could not deduce (Monad t1) arising from a use of ‘return’ from the context (MonadWidget t m)
I can use ScopedTypeVariables
and type the default config in the confirmDialog
as DialogConfig t m a b
and that works, however shouldn't it work even without it? It seems to me that the types are rather unambiguous.
Upvotes: 6
Views: 696
Reputation: 116174
As mentioned in the comments, the problem is that record update can change the type of the record (which can be surprising at first). Here's a test in GHCi:
> data T a = T { tA :: a }
> let x = T "foo"
> :t x
x :: T [Char]
> :t x { tA = True }
x { tA = True } :: T Bool
So, we can't define a default:
> let def :: Read a => T a ; def = T (read "True")
> :t def :: T Bool
def :: T Bool :: T Bool
> :t def { tA = 5 }
Could not deduce (Read t0) arising from a use of ‘def’
The type variable ‘t0’ is ambiguous
Indeed, above def
could be of any type.
A possible solution could be forcing the update to have the same type by requiring a T a -> T a
continuation function.
> let defF :: Read a => (T a -> T a) -> T a ; defF f = f (T (read "True"))
> :t defF (\d -> d { tA = False })
defF (\d -> d { tA = False }) :: T Bool
Above d
is the default which, by construction, must have the same type of the record after the update.
With lenses, there might be better approaches.
Upvotes: 4